Clarify "Co-authored-by" usage in PRs
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 2.1k
- 分支
- 1k
- 平均合併
- 2 天 12 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 12
描述
As brought up in a Discourse committers topic, the devguide could be more clear about Pull Request attribution on GitHub.
Specifically, in the fourth paragraph of "Handling Others' Code", the Co-authored-by: feature of GitHub is mentioned, but the use case of it is not defined.
Since GitHub will automatically attribute the primary author of the PR when using "squash and merge" or the "automerge", the Co-authored-by: is useful to add just prior to merging for anyone that significantly contributed to the PR, either via review or direct suggested changes. When using the GitHub UI to directly commit a suggested change to the PR, a Co-authored-by: line is automatically added to the commit message. Otherwise though, it has to be done manually for people other than the author to be attributed for contributing to the PR.
With this being a rather substantial part of the workflow for GitHub PRs, it seems to be worthwhile to mention when Co-authored-by: should be used rather than mentioning the feature without elaborating further.
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
閱讀 devguide 的「Handling Others' Code」部分的第四段,並查看連結的 Discourse 主題以了解背景。釐清 GitHub 的 Co-authored-by: 行何時應用於重要的 review 或建議修改貢獻,包括它與 squash、automerge 以及直接建議的修改之間的關係。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- github
- 領域
- documentation
- Issue 類型
- 文件
- 難度
- 1/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-3 小時
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 新手友好度
- 52/100