3.11: _PyUnicode_Equal call sites lack error handling
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 558
描述
(Found while looking at https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/98783)
In https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/81c72044a181dbbfbf689d7a977d0d99090f26a8, several uses of _PyUnicode_EqualToASCIIId, which cannot fail, were replaced with _PyUnicode_Equal, which can fail: it calls PyUnicode_READY() in Python 3.11, and returns -1 on failure.
In Python 3.12, this is not a problem: _PyUnicode_Equal cannot fail, since it does not need to call PyUnicode_READY() since the wstr APIs were removed in https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/f9c9354a7a173eaca2aa19e667b5cf12167b7fed. But it is theoretically a problem in 3.11.
In 3.11, git grep "_PyUnicode_Equal(" turns up the following:
Include/cpython/unicodeobject.h:PyAPI_FUNC(int) _PyUnicode_Equal(PyObject *, PyObject *);
Modules/_pickle.c: use_newobj_ex = _PyUnicode_Equal(name, &_Py_ID(__newobj_ex__));
Modules/_pickle.c: use_newobj = _PyUnicode_Equal(name, &_Py_ID(__newobj__));
Objects/longobject.c: else if (_PyUnicode_Equal(byteorder, &_Py_ID(little)))
Objects/longobject.c: else if (_PyUnicode_Equal(byteorder, &_Py_ID(big)))
Objects/longobject.c: else if (_PyUnicode_Equal(byteorder, &_Py_ID(little)))
Objects/longobject.c: else if (_PyUnicode_Equal(byteorder, &_Py_ID(big)))
Objects/typeobject.c: if (mod != NULL && !_PyUnicode_Equal(mod, &_Py_ID(builtins)))
Objects/typeobject.c: if (_PyUnicode_Equal(name, &_Py_ID(__dict__))) {
Objects/typeobject.c: if (_PyUnicode_Equal(name, &_Py_ID(__weakref__))) {
Objects/typeobject.c: if ((ctx->add_dict && _PyUnicode_Equal(slot, &_Py_ID(__dict__))) ||
Objects/typeobject.c: (ctx->add_weak && _PyUnicode_Equal(slot, &_Py_ID(__weakref__))))
Objects/typeobject.c: if (!_PyUnicode_Equal(slot, &_Py_ID(__qualname__)) &&
Objects/typeobject.c: !_PyUnicode_Equal(slot, &_Py_ID(__classcell__)))
Objects/typeobject.c: if (mod != NULL && !_PyUnicode_Equal(mod, &_Py_ID(builtins)))
Objects/typeobject.c: _PyUnicode_Equal(name, &_Py_ID(__class__)))
Objects/typeobject.c: if (_PyUnicode_Equal(name, &_Py_ID(__class__))) {
Objects/unicodeobject.c:_PyUnicode_Equal(PyObject *str1, PyObject *str2)
Python/ceval.c: int res = _PyUnicode_Equal(left, right);
Python/errors.c: if (!_PyUnicode_Equal(modulename, &_Py_ID(builtins)) &&
Python/errors.c: !_PyUnicode_Equal(modulename, &_Py_ID(__main__))) {
Python/pythonrun.c: if (!_PyUnicode_Equal(modulename, &_Py_ID(builtins)) &&
Python/pythonrun.c: !_PyUnicode_Equal(modulename, &_Py_ID(__main__)))
Broken down:
- _pickle.c
- Could the result of
_PyObject_LookupAttr(callable, &_Py_ID(__name__), &name)be unready?
- Could the result of
- longobject.c
- Safe because argument clinic calls
PyUnicode_READY()
- Safe because argument clinic calls
- typeobject.c
ctx->slotscould be an arbitrary tuple of potentially-unready strings, so there should be some call toPyUnicode_READY()at or beforetype_new_visit_slots.
- ceval.c
- Already has the error checking (though it could be removed in 3.12!)
- errors.c and pythonrun.c:
- Arbitrary result of
PyObject_GetAttr(exc_type, &_Py_ID(__module__));might not be_READY()?
- Arbitrary result of
The good news is that this would be hard to run into in practice: it requires both using the old deprecated wstr APIs and running into a memory error during PyUnicode_READY().
cc @ericsnowcurrently @methane
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
先在 Python 3.11 分支上使用 git grep 查找 _PyUnicode_Equal,然后阅读 Modules/_pickle.c、Objects/longobject.c、Objects/typeobject.c、Python/ceval.c、Python/errors.c 和 Python/pythonrun.c 中列出的调用点。跟踪每个输入是否可能是尚未准备好的 Unicode 对象,以及 PyUnicode_READY() 的失败如何传播。受影响的调用点具有安全的错误处理或经过验证的就绪保证后,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- c, python
- 领域
- backend
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100