Proper or custom JSON serialization of non-finite float values
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 558
描述
Feature or enhancement
The goal of this feature is to allow the JSON serializer in stdlib to serialize non-finite values (NaN, Inf, -Inf) according to the JSON specification. Going beyond just conforming to the spec, we could allow for custom serialization behavior.
Previous discussion
This problem was previously discussed in #84813, and a related PR was submitted in 2019, however, @mdickinson suggested I open a fresh issue where we can discuss the implementation in-depth.
Pitch
Currently, python's default JSON serializer encodes values like NaN as-is, with the explanation being that many JS-based JSON libraries also do this, and that the corresponding parsers can handle such non-conforming input.
In reality, most major browsers do not support this type of encoding and even NodeJS(v14.16.0) acts according to the previously-linked JSON spec.
The keyword argument allow_nan makes the serializer throw when encountering non-finite values when set to true, but I'd argue it is paramount to ensure compatibility with the spec and modern browsers. Changing the default behavior is of course not needed or possible at this point.
When implementing this feature, there are two main decisions to make.
Firstly, it has to be decided if allow_nan should be extended to take more datatypes like strings and callables, or if we should create a separate argument for this functionality.
Re-purposing allow_nan would make the control over such behavior centralized, however the name is very limiting.
It doesn't say anything about other non-finite values, and without looking at the docs, one would think it only takes bool values.
Secondly, it has to be decided how far we want to take this feature.
Do we want to have pre-defined cases like as_is, throw, and to_null, or do we want to allow the user to pass their own callable? The latter is implemented by the linked PR. Having both options is also a possibility.
Overall, each combination of decisions has its advantages and drawbacks. Since I wasn't a part of such discussions before, I don't have a preference.
All I want is to see this feature get implemented, and I can create a PR once consensus is reached.
Linked PRs
- gh-115246
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先查看 #84813 中之前的讨论、相关的 PR 13233 以及链接的 PR gh-115246。当项目就序列化 NaN、Inf 和 -Inf 的 API 与行为达成共识(包括是否支持自定义 callable)时,这项工作就准备就绪了。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- backend-api-design
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100