zipapp creates executable files with wrong permissions bits
@pfmoore 已經在處理了。
開始於 2026年7月30日。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 36k
- 平均合併
- 1 天 9 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 558
描述
Owing to the fact that open() has no flags field for marking a file as executable, and doing that after the fact is difficult (since it involves playing around with umask), the current implementation of zipapp uses the following code to attempt to set the file executable:
os.chmod(new_archive, os.stat(new_archive).st_mode | stat.S_IEXEC)
Which is incorrect: this sets only the execute bit for the user, and will never set it for the group or "other" categories, regardless of the umask.
This was discussed in a series of comments in #96772, starting around
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/67679#issuecomment-1093675286
Create and open executable file respecting the Unix user's umask:
os.fdopen(os.open(filename, os.O_CREAT|os.O_RDWR), "rw")
and ending with
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/67679#issuecomment-1093675294
OK, thanks. I don't propose to go there with the initial implementation. If it's a problem in practice, someone can raise a bug and we'll fix it then. (I've never seen actual Python code in the wild that does all of that...)
This is a problem in practice for us.
We're trying to replace the C version of Cockpit with a Python zipapp, and the file gets created with permissions that allow the current user to run it, but won't allow the file to be installed in /usr/bin so everyone can run it.
We can work around it easy enough — chmod +x in the Makefile after we call zipapp, but this is a bug in zipapp that really ought to be fixed.
For what it's worth, I think the os.fdopen() approach originally proposed by "dholth" is the best one.
Linked PRs
- gh-151970
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
評估
這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。