Handling of surrogates on JSON encoding

When json.dumps is called with ensure_ascii = True (the default), the output does not distinguish between Unicode characters outside of the BMP and their corresponding surrogate characters. This means that json.loads(json.dumps(s)) is not guaranteed to return s:

>>> json.loads(json.dumps('𝄞')) == '𝄞'
True
>>> json.loads(json.dumps('\ud834\udd1e')) == '\ud834\udd1e'
False

The only way to get surrogate characters back is to have them in the JSON string as actual characters, not escaped:

>>> json.loads( '"\ud83d\udca9"')  # Actual surrogate characters
'\ud83d\udca9'
>>> json.loads(r'"\ud83d\udca9"')  # Escaped surrogates
'💩'

Python does handle the case of lone surrogates reasonably (although RFC 8259 basically declares this undefined behaviour), so the round-trip does work in some cases:

>>> json.loads(json.dumps('\ud83d'))
'\ud83d'

It would seem reasonable to expect that json.loads(json.dumps(s)) == s would hold for any string. This isn't really a bug but rather a limitation of pure-ASCII encoding. However, I think it does deserve a mention in the documentation. Possibly at the end of the Character encodings section? I'm not quite sure.

Comece pela seção “Character encodings” da documentação de JSON, vinculada na issue. Revise o comportamento demonstrado para caracteres não pertencentes ao BMP, pares substitutos e substitutos isolados; em seguida, documente a limitação do round-trip e sua relação com ensure_ascii=True. O trabalho estará concluído quando a seção explicar claramente quando json.loads(json.dumps(s)) pode não ser igual a s.