python / python/cpython

`PyImport_CreateModuleFromInitfunc()`: wrong `__name__` for submodules, non-ASCII names rejected, inittab name clashes

Aperta
#157,384 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

interpreter-core topic-C-API type-bug
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
77.2k
Fork
35.9k
Metriche di merge delle PR
Metriche PR in attesa

Descrizione

Bug report

Bug description:

Since PyImport_CreateModuleFromInitfunc() was added (in 3.15, gh-116146), I ran into some issues from real world use internally at Meta (with 3.15+, as well as our 3.14 fork, which has this backported). Collected here as a single issue for convenience - let me know if splitting is preferred.

The API is built on the internal create_builtin() helper, and inherits a few inittab behaviors that don't make sense for an explicitly-passed init function.

  1. Single-phase submodules get the short name. The package context is never set while initfunc runs, so a single-phase init that creates its module as sub (what pybind11's PYBIND11_MODULE(sub, m) does) ends up with __name__ == 'sub' while the spec says pkg.sub. The original impl handled that, but it was lost somewhere on the way.
  2. Non-ASCII spec names raise UnicodeEncodeError, even for multi-phase modules, which the dynamic loader accepts.
  3. Names registered in PyImport_Inittab are handled silently. Depending on the state of the builtin, initfunc is ignored, or the module created here replaces the builtin for later imports, or (multi-phase builtin) initfunc's module overwrites the real one in sys.modules. sys and builtins fall in the first bucket.
  4. Undocumented semantics. Single-phase modules are added to sys.modules by the call itself, multi-phase ones aren't. The spec name is the module's identity, so a second call with the same name and a different initfunc returns the cached module and never calls the new function.

The existing test only covers one top-level single-phase and one top-level multi-phase module, so none of this was caught.

AI disclosure: I ran into the first issue in production, used Claude Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 to root cause, which flagged the other issues while investigating. Fable 5.1 prepared the fixes.

Demo output before any fix:

pkg.sub: repr=<module 'sub'> __name__=sub
non-ASCII name: UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character '\xf6'
same name, initfunc B after A: which=A  calls_a=1 calls_b=0
'_random' via custom initfunc, then `import _random`: <module 'same'>  hasattr(Random)=False

Tests demonstrating all of the above: https://github.com/itamaro/cpython/tree/gh-116146-initfunc-tests-only

Plan

One PR each:

  • Set the package context while calling initfunc, like the dynamic loader does (1)
  • Accept non-ASCII names for multi-phase init; single-phase gets the same SystemError as dynamic loading (2)
  • Raise ImportError for names registered in PyImport_Inittab (3)
  • Document the sys.modules and name-identity behavior (4)
CPython versions tested on:

CPython main branch, 3.15

Operating systems tested on:

Linux, macOS

Linked PRs
  • gh-157387
  • gh-157388
  • gh-157389
  • gh-157390
  • gh-157758

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia con PyImport_CreateModuleFromInitfunc(), i test esistenti per i moduli di primo livello a fase singola e a più fasi e il branch di test collegato gh-116146-initfunc-tests-only. Confronta il suo comportamento con PyImport_Inittab e il loader dinamico. Il lavoro è completo quando sono stati affrontati i quattro elementi della checklist, inclusa la semantica documentata di sys.modules e dell’identità dei nomi; le PR collegate gh-157387 fino a gh-157390 e gh-157758 mostrano che il lavoro è già in corso.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
backend
Tipo di issue
Bug
Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
25/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.