python / python/cpython

linecache.cache and linecache.getlines() are not documented

未关闭
#156,679 6 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

@picnixz 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年9月2日。

docs
主要语言
Python
星标
77.2k
派生
35.9k
PR 合并指标
PR 指标待抓取

描述

Documentation

linecache.cache is not underscored, and is widely used throughout the python ecosystem to provide source context for dynamically generated Python functions. Examples include attrs

https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs/blob/764bf92a1c96abe4615b59f3e5a7b738b0340a94/src/attr/_make.py#L230-L263

as well as ipython:

https://github.com/ipython/ipython/blob/19f9ae0a863c21cff52fa07c74b18fc5b482d9c3/IPython/core/compilerop.py#L138-L182

a code search on github reports over 700 files accessing this attribute directly and assuming it's a dict:

https://github.com/search?q=linecache.cache+language%3APython&type=code&p=1

the utility of linecache.cache is significant, in that it allows us to provide real source lines for generated code that comes up in stacktraces, and which is also walkable in pdb. The linecache.lazycache() documented API almost provides this functionality, but is explicitly blocked for string-oriented "filenames" like <string>.

Without linecache.cache:


broken_function="""\
def go():
    print("step1")
    print("step2")
    x = 1 / 0
    print("step3")
"""

code = compile(broken_function, "<custom go() function>", "exec")

exec(code, env := {})

env["go"]()

this code produces a stack trace that sees the generated function as opaque:

$ python test3.py
step1
step2
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/classic/dev/sqlalchemy/test3.py", line 14, in <module>
    env["go"]()
    ~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "<custom go() function>", line 4, in go
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

however add linecache and suddenly we get much more detail:

import linecache

broken_function = """\
def go():
    print("step1")
    print("step2")
    x = 1 / 0
    print("step3")
"""

filename = "<custom go() function>"
code = compile(broken_function, filename, "exec")

entry = (
    len(broken_function),
    None,
    broken_function.splitlines(True),
    filename,
)
linecache.cache[filename] = entry

exec(code, env := {})

env["go"]()

now we get introspection into the generated function itself:

$ python test3.py
step1
step2
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/classic/dev/sqlalchemy/test3.py", line 24, in <module>
    env["go"]()
    ~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "<custom go() function>", line 4, in go
    x = 1 / 0
        ~~^~~
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

The None used as the second entry of the tuple is so that checkcache() skips asserting that the filename is actually a file; this is commented by the ipython project in the link above.

There is one documented API that is close to this use case linecache.lazycache(), but it's explicitly disallowed from working with the universal convention for generated code, a name in angle brackets ( see https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/af4ee512e97a33d34359695b64ec1e31e8ce44d1/Lib/linecache.py#L224-L226), and also for this use case would require us to fabricate a loader object with a get_source() method and a module_globals dict carrying __name__.

from my perspective it seems that the behavior of compile() could be improved directly by providing options to populate the linecache, or alternatively that lazycache() could accommodate the angle-bracket names that generated code actually uses, however neither seems to be an option today. Hence we see widespread direct manipulation of linecache.cache, and this technique has by now escaped containment and is being recommended by robots such as Claude.

I am seeking clarification on why this attribute has remained undocumented for so long, if this is in fact public API, or if it's in some kind of "public, but we really don't like people doing this" sort of limbo (and if so, is there an opening for actual features to be proposed).

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。