asyncio: SelectorEventLoop busy-loops at 100% CPU forever when the self-pipe socketpair reaches EOF
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Métricas de PR pendientes
Descripción
Bug description
The selector-side twin of #156333. BaseSelectorEventLoop also wakes itself through a self-socket created by socket.socketpair(). On Windows this is a loopback TCP pair, and if the connection reaches a clean EOF while the loop runs, _read_from_self returns but the reader is still registered on the dead fd — select() reports it readable immediately, forever, pinning one core at 100% with nothing logged.
Lib/asyncio/selector_events.py:
def _read_from_self(self):
while True:
try:
data = self._ssock.recv(4096)
if not data:
break
self._process_self_data(data)
except InterruptedError:
continue
except BlockingIOError:
break
At EOF, recv() returns b'', the loop breaks, and the callback returns. But the fd is still registered via _add_reader(self._ssock.fileno(), self._read_from_self) from _make_self_pipe(). A closed-for-read socket is permanently "readable", so every select() iteration re-fires the callback — a tight spin. The loop is otherwise idle and never recovers.
The proactor half of this bug is fixed by #156343 (rebuild the pair on the empty result). The same OS teardown of the loopback pair that triggers it triggers this on any WindowsSelectorEventLoopPolicy process.
Reproducer (deterministic, Windows)
import asyncio, socket, time
calls = 0
orig = asyncio.selector_events.BaseSelectorEventLoop._read_from_self
def counting(self):
global calls
calls += 1
return orig(self)
asyncio.selector_events.BaseSelectorEventLoop._read_from_self = counting
async def main():
loop = asyncio.get_running_loop()
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
loop._csock.shutdown(socket.SHUT_WR) # graceful half-close = clean EOF
global calls
calls = 0
start = time.process_time()
await asyncio.sleep(3)
print(f"_read_from_self calls during 3s idle: {calls}")
print(f"CPU consumed while sleeping 3s: {time.process_time() - start:.2f}s")
loop = asyncio.SelectorEventLoop()
asyncio.set_event_loop(loop)
loop.run_until_complete(main())
Measured on Windows 11, CPython main (3.16.0a0, self-built): 582,692 callback invocations, 1.23s CPU, during a 3-second idle sleep. Expected ~0.
Note the instrumentation must patch the class before the loop is created — _make_self_pipe() captures the bound method at registration time, so patching an instance afterwards does not intercept the already-armed reader (which is also why the spin is invisible to profilers that hook late).
Environment
- Windows 11, self-built main (3.16.0a0)
- The proactor variant (#156333) reproduces on installed 3.12.10 / 3.13.12; the
_read_from_selfcode path shown above is unchanged on main
Notes on scope
- Unix loops use an AF_UNIX pair, which the OS does not tear down this way, so the organic trigger is Windows-specific; a deterministic test using
shutdown(SHUT_WR)works on any platform, though. - Related, on the proactor side: the same teardown can also surface as
ConnectionResetErrorfrom the pending recv instead of a clean EOF; that path is currently unhandled too (noted in #156343).
Suggested direction
On recv() == b'', rebuild the self-pipe the way #156343 does for the proactor loop: allocate the new pair first, move any signal wakeup fd registration (set_wakeup_fd() returns the previous fd, so it can be probed and moved only when it names the old socket — Unix loops with signal handlers), remove the old reader, close the old sockets, and register the reader on the new fd.
Linked PRs
- gh-156345
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza en Lib/asyncio/selector_events.py con _read_from_self y _make_self_pipe; después compara la corrección del proactor en #156343 y el trabajo relacionado en #156345. Reproduce el caso de EOF del self-pipe en Windows y verifica que un bucle selector inactivo ya no invoque repetidamente al lector, mientras la registración del signal wakeup siga siendo correcta.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- backend, operating-systems
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100