python / python/cpython

Don't rely on errno values, coming from platform's math functions

未关闭
#156,145 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

extension-modules interpreter-core type-feature
主要语言
Python
星标
77.2k
派生
35.9k
PR 合并指标
PR 指标待抓取

描述

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

In the cmath module most functions don't check errno values. See cosh() example below, which set nonzero errno in some cases, but don't read errno (e.g. to detect overflow in libm's cosh/sinh()). Here we essentially assume, that platform implements Annex F of the C standard:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/04242c027feeff726acb15b6463422897b489bcf/Modules/cmathmodule.c#L441-L490

What if we extend this approach to the rest of CPython's floating-point arithmetics? Now this seems natural, as we require that platforms C double has IEEE 754 binary64 format. On practice, that means much more, i.e. that platform supports Annex F (modulo bugs). And we can utilize that, assuming that for invalid input - NaN's produced, for overflows - infinities.

For example, instead of current code of float_pow() that handle finite input
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/04242c027feeff726acb15b6463422897b489bcf/Objects/floatobject.c#L788-L801
we could use something much more simple:

    ix = pow(iv, iw);
    if (negate_result)
        ix = -ix;
    if (isinf(ix)) {
        PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
                        "float exponentiation result out of range");
        return NULL;
    }

(_Py_ADJUST_ERANGE1 and _Py_ADJUST_ERANGE2 helpers will be removed.)

See recent d.p.o thread for illustration of subtle issues, that can be introduced trying to fix errno, coming from platforms functions. We also have occurring bugreports, when platform libm set errno wrongly, e.g. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/153144.

Disclaimer: this issue filled, based on my humble understanding of the proposal by @mdickinson. It seems, there are volunteers to work on this (CC @hpkfft), hence issue was opened.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

https://discuss.python.org/t/108539/

Linked PRs
  • gh-156551

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

先阅读提案和链接的 Discourse 讨论,然后检查 Modules/cmathmodule.c、Objects/floatobject.c 和 Include/internal/pycore_pymath.h。将现有的 errno 处理和调整辅助函数与链接的 platform-libm 错误报告进行比较;完成这项工作需要针对所有受影响的算术运算,确定一种一致且可测试的浮点错误处理方案。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
c, python
领域
operating-systems
Issue 类型
功能
难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
需要澄清
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。