python / python/cpython

tarfile: unbounded memory use on large pax and GNU extensions

未关闭
#155,633 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

stdlib type-bug
主要语言
Python
星标
77.2k
派生
35.9k
PR 合并指标
PR 指标待抓取

描述

Bug report

Bug description:

This is somewhat similar to https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/151497, and fits under the larger umbrella of https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/141713.

Summary

Both the pax and GNU tar families support extensions, via different mechanisms. These extensions have pre-declared lengths, and a tar parser must read a payload of length bytes to consume them.

Prior to https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/151497 this was done in a single read(n) call, resulting in a single large up-front allocation. That was changed to _safe_read with https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/151498, which bounds each read call to 1MB.

This prevents unbounded memory consumption at the read site, but not in aggregate. For example, an attacker can still contrive a pax-style tar archive with an extremely large individual pax record, and tarfile will buffer that pax record (in 1MB increments) into memory. The same is true for GNU extensions.

Solution

I think the solution is to put a reasonable caps on the sizes of extensions.

This could be done at a few different layers (e.g. restricting individual pax record sizes versus the entire pax extension size), but I think doing it at the extension size layer is probably simplest and most consistent.

My proposal would be:

  1. No pax or GNU extension should ever exceed 1 MB in raw size (i.e., the size reported by its tar frame). This is extremely conservative, i.e. should be well above what any real-world tar would need to put in its extensions.
  2. For pax in particular, the global pax extension state should never exceed some reasonable multiplier of the extension cap. For example, someone shouldn't be able to induce higher memory usage by chaining g -> g -> g -> ... -> file.txt, where each g member has 1MB of pax extension state.

For prior art, we perform this kind of bounding in tar-codec, e.g. here:

https://github.com/astral-sh/tar-codec/blob/dbd4b5efeb6edb732c993d107a7cfdc83f8d29a8/crates/tar-framing/src/stream.rs#L1099-L1154

and we impose a default cap of 256KB for pax extensions, 1MB for all active global pax extensions, and 128KB for GNU extensions:

https://github.com/astral-sh/tar-codec/blob/dbd4b5efeb6edb732c993d107a7cfdc83f8d29a8/crates/tar-framing/src/lib.rs#L124-L137

(These numbers are not particularly scientific; we picked them because we think even 256KB is very conservative i.e. high for pax, and 128KB for GNU is well beyond what any normal OS will accept as a pathname length limit.)

CPython versions tested on:

CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

No response

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 tarfile 的 pax 和 GNU 扩展解析入手,包括现有的 _safe_read 路径,并检查相关测试。重现包含超大扩展或链式扩展的归档,然后为原始扩展大小和累积的全局 pax 状态定义并测试限制,以确保解析不会使内存无限增长。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
python
领域
security
Issue 类型
缺陷
难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
48/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。