PyContext watcher registry has data races in free-threaded builds

Bug description

PyContext_AddWatcher() and PyContext_ClearWatcher() are public in Python 3.14's and above free-threaded builds, but CPython's context-watcher registry is accessed without synchronization.

The public declarations are available unconditionally for CPython 3.14+ builds:

• PyContext_WatchCallback, PyContext_AddWatcher(), and PyContext_ClearWatcher()

The per-interpreter registry consists of two ordinary, non-atomic fields:

• PyInterpreterState.context_watchers[CONTEXT_MAX_WATCHERS], an array of callback function pointers
• PyInterpreterState.active_context_watchers, a uint8_t bitmask indicating which slots are active

All three operations access this shared state without a lock or atomic operations:

1. notify_context_watchers() reads the bitmask and callback pointers.
2. PyContext_AddWatcher() scans and writes the callback array, then performs a read-modify-write on the bitmask.
3. PyContext_ClearWatcher() reads and clears the callback slot, then performs another read-modify-write on the bitmask.

Notification is performed directly by the thread whose current context changes: context_switched() calls notify_context_watchers(), including from PyContext_Enter() and PyContext_Exit(). On a free-threaded interpreter, multiple attached threads in the same interpreter can therefore dispatch callbacks concurrently while another thread calls AddWatcher or ClearWatcher.

This creates CPython-internal data races, independently of whether the callback protects its own state:

Concurrent operations	Shared objects	Possible result
AddWatcher / AddWatcher	Callback slots and active bitmask	Both callers can select the same empty slot, one callback can overwrite the other, and both can return the same watcher ID. Concurrent bitmask read-modify-writes can also lose an update.
AddWatcher / notification	Callback slots and active bitmask	Notification can observe an active bit without a safely published callback pointer, or otherwise observe inconsistent/stale registry state.
ClearWatcher / notification	Callback slots and active bitmask	Notification can snapshot an active bit and then load a callback slot which has become NULL. In a debug build this reaches assert(cb != NULL); in a release build it may attempt to call a NULL or stale function pointer.
ClearWatcher / ClearWatcher	Callback slot and active bitmask	Both callers can observe the slot as registered, and their unsynchronized reads/writes constitute a data race.
AddWatcher / ClearWatcher	Callback slots and active bitmask	A slot may be reused while another operation is clearing it, producing a mismatched callback/active-bit state.

The same implementation is present on the current Python 3.14 branch.

There is also an API-lifetime question: PyContext_ClearWatcher() does not specify whether a callback already selected by another thread may begin or continue after ClearWatcher returns. Without that guarantee, an extension cannot know when it is safe to tear down state used by its callback. Separately, because notifications run on the switching threads, the documentation should say explicitly that a single PyContext_WatchCallback may be invoked concurrently by multiple threads in a free-threaded interpreter.

The context watcher documentation currently specifies registration, clearing, and exception handling, but does not describe any free-threading restrictions or concurrency guarantees.

For comparison:

• Dictionary watcher documentation explicitly says AddWatcher and ClearWatcher are not internally synchronized and require external synchronization on free-threaded builds.
• Type watcher documentation explicitly requires PyType_AddWatcher() to run at startup before spawning the first thread.

A startup-only rule would avoid concurrent AddWatcher calls, but it would not by itself make ClearWatcher safe against notifications from active threads. Context switches are normal runtime operations, so external synchronization against internal notification is not generally available to an extension.

Expected behavior

Access to CPython's per-interpreter context-watcher registry should be data-race-free in free-threaded builds.

The API should also define:

• whether the same callback can execute concurrently on multiple threads;
• whether PyContext_ClearWatcher() waits for, cancels, or permits already-selected/in-flight callbacks;
• when callback-owned state may safely be destroyed after clearing a watcher.

The implementation likely needs synchronization or an atomic publication/snapshot scheme for AddWatcher, ClearWatcher, and notification. Any solution should account for callback reentrancy and avoid holding a registry lock while calling extension callbacks.

At minimum, if concurrent registration or clearing cannot be supported, the documentation should state enforceable startup/shutdown restrictions. Documentation alone does not appear sufficient for ClearWatcher racing with notification unless the API also provides a usable lifetime rule.

CPython versions

• Python 3.14 branch at e2ec020314487c3fea9807894172becb6c5f4577
• CPython main at dbac03b411549c0f40fbb66127ae6f445027fcc8

This report is based on source inspection. The races are platform-independent C data races in the free-threaded build; I have not included a probabilistic crash reproducer.

Operating systems

All platforms using a free-threaded CPython build.

Related issues

• gh-127124: Pass opaque state to PyContext_AddWatcher callback is related to callback state management, but does not appear to cover synchronization of the watcher registry.

CPython versions tested on:

3.14

Operating systems tested on:

macOS

Linked PRs

• gh-155943

從 Python/context.c 和 Include/internal/pycore_interp_structs.h 中的 PyInterpreterState 欄位開始，然後檢視 Doc/c-api/contextvars.rst 中的 context watcher API。追蹤 notify_context_watchers()、PyContext_AddWatcher() 和 PyContext_ClearWatcher()；完成條件是 registry 在 free-threaded 建置中沒有競態，且文件定義 callback 並行以及清除和生命週期保證。