Escaped quotes cause source comments to leak into debug f-string output and t-string metadata
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Métricas de merge de PRs
- Métricas de PR pendentes
Descrição
Bug report
Bug description:
When an f-string or t-string replacement expression contains a backslash-escaped quote, a following source comment can be copied into runtime output or t-string metadata.
Observed effects:
- A debug f-string includes the source comment in the resulting str.
- A debug t-string includes the comment in Template.strings.
- A debug t-string includes both the debug = and the comment inInterpolation.expression.
- A non-debug t-string also retains the comment inInterpolation.expression.
The replacement expression itself evaluates to the correct value. The problemappears to be in reconstruction of the replacement-field source text.
Reproducer
f_result = f"{'\'' = # c
}"
t_debug = t"{'a\'b' = # c
}"
t_plain = t"{'a\'b' # c
}"
print("debug f-string result:", repr(f_result))
print("\ndebug t-string strings:", repr(t_debug.strings))
print("\ndebug t-string expression:", repr(t_debug.interpolations[0].expression))
print("\nnon-debug t-string expression:", repr(t_plain.interpolations[0].expression))
Actual behavior
On CPython main commit b86a41c, the output contains the source text # c in all four observed values.
debug f-string result: '\'\\\'\' = # c\n"\'"'
debug t-string strings: ("'a\\'b' = # c\n", '')
debug t-string expression: "'a\\'b' = # c"
non-debug t-string expression: "'a\\'b' # c"
Possible cause
The behavior appears to be caused by inconsistent escaped-character handling between two scans in _PyLexer_set_ftstring_expr() in Parser/lexer/string.c.
The initial scan that detects a comment outside a string literal explicitly skips a backslash and the character following it:
if (ch == '\\') {
i++;
continue;
}
However, after a comment has been detected, the subsequent reconstruction pass that removes comments appears not to perform the equivalent skip. It changes in_string whenever it encounters a quote:
if (ch == '"' || ch == '\'') {
if (!in_string) {
in_string = 1;
quote_char = ch;
}
else if (ch == quote_char) {
in_string = 0;
}
}
else if (ch == '#' && !in_string) {
/* skip the comment */
}
For:
'a\'b' = # c
the second pass may interpret the escaped quote as the end of the string and the real closing quote as the beginning of another string:
' begin string
\ treated as an ordinary character
' incorrectly treated as end of string
b
' incorrectly treated as beginning of another string
# incorrectly considered to be inside a string
Consequently, the # is not recognized by the comment-removal branch and the comment is copied into the reconstructed text.
This also explains why the same input pattern affects both f-strings and t-strings: both use the same replacement-expression reconstruction logic.
This is a proposed root cause based on the observed behavior and source review, not a confirmed diagnosis.
CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch, 3.16
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-154914
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Direção de pesquisa
Comece em Parser/lexer/string.c, em _PyLexer_set_ftstring_expr(), comparando a varredura inicial de escaped characters com a passagem posterior de reconstrução para remoção de comentários. Execute o reproducer fornecido de f-string e t-string no CPython main. Considera-se concluído quando escaped quotes não fizerem mais com que # c apareça na saída de debug f-string, em strings t-string ou nos metadados de interpolação.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- python
- Domínio
- compilers
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Dificuldade
- 3/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-2 dias
- Status de atividade
- Estagnada
- Clareza
- Claramente especificada
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 35/100