LIST_APPEND and SET_ADD opcodes safety in Free Threading
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 35.9k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Hi,
While reviewing PR gh-152273, I moved _Py_CRITICAL_SECTION_ASSERT_OBJECT_LOCKED(so); check to set_add_entry_takeref() to check for bugs. I discovered that SET_ADD opcode calls _PySet_AddTakeRef() without getting the set critical section. That's surprising and IMO it would deserve adding a comment to explain why it's safe to omit locking here.
LIST_APPEND has a similar design (also omit locking).
The following code uses the evil gc.get_objects() function to call set.add() in a different thread while the main thread is building a set:
import dis
import gc
import threading
GLOBAL_SET = None
def worker():
EVENT.wait()
obj = GLOBAL_SET
for i in range(100):
# Call set.add() which uses the critical section
obj.add(i)
MARKER = b"MARKER".decode()
EVENT = threading.Event()
class EvilHash:
def __init__(self, hash_value):
self.hash_value = hash_value
def __hash__(self):
global GLOBAL_SET, EVENT
if GLOBAL_SET is None:
# Invoke the evil gc.get_objects()!
for obj in gc.get_objects():
if isinstance(obj, set) and MARKER in obj:
GLOBAL_SET = obj
EVENT.set()
return self.hash_value
def __repr__(self):
return f"EvilHash({self.hash_value})"
def func():
build_set = {
# Use *list so following items are added by SET_ADD opcode
*[MARKER],
# Added by SET_ADD which calls _PySet_AddTakeRef()
# without the critical section
EvilHash(0), EvilHash(1), EvilHash(2), EvilHash(3), EvilHash(4),
EvilHash(5)}
print(build_set)
print("Length:", len(build_set))
if len(build_set) != 107:
raise Exception("race condition!")
thread = threading.Thread(target=worker)
thread.start()
func()
thread.join()
#dis.dis(func)
I expected the code to fail randomly, but so far I failed to trigger a race condition on Free Threading. Running the code on Python built with --with-thread-sanitizer doesn't show any warning.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先通过 _PySet_AddTakeRef() 和 set_add_entry_takeref() 跟踪 SET_ADD 和 LIST_APPEND,并使用提供的线程 reproducer 进行行为检查。在 free-threaded build 上运行它,包括 thread-sanitized build,并确定省略 critical section 是否安全。完成的标准是已经确立安全性依据,并涵盖任何必要的解释或修正。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- backend
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 48/100