`arraymodule`, `_decimal`: possible lazy import caches reference leaks in free-threaded builds

Bug description:

As pointed out by @htjworld in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/148088#issuecomment-4196296604:

I was wondering about the lazy init pattern in a free-threaded build. If two threads enter build_struct_time concurrently with st->time_struct_time == NULL, both would call PyImport_ImportModuleAttrString and one overwrite would leave a reference with an incremented refcount that never gets decref'd.

I noticed arraymodule.c and _decimal.c have the same pattern, so maybe this is just accepted. But _asynciomodule.c initializes eagerly in module_init() which avoids this structurally. Was lazy chosen deliberately here over eager init in init_state()?

While I've addressed this in #148088, I think that this is a valid concern, and import caches should use CAS, just like:

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/7e0a0be4097f9d29d66fe23f5af86f18a34ed7dd/Modules/_sre/sre.c#L1173-L1188

If there's interest, I can do it.

(It seems similar to #149000, so perhaps a more thorough check warranted.)

CPython versions tested on:

CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

macOS

Beginne damit, die verzögerte Initialisierung in arraymodule.c und _decimal.c mit der eifrigen Initialisierung in _asynciomodule.c und dem CAS-Muster in Modules/_sre/sre.c zu vergleichen. Prüfe die Free-Threaded-Pfade auf konkurrierende Initialisierung und Referenzlecks; als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn die betroffenen Import-Caches unter diesem Nebenläufigkeitsmuster sicher sind und das relevante Verhalten durch Validierung abgedeckt ist.