Specialize syntax error for assignment expressions in invalid places
未关闭
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
interpreter-core
topic-parser
type-feature
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 35.9k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
There are a few places where (unparenthesized) assignment expressions are not accepted but users might think of using them. For example:
>>> func(arg=x := foo())
File "<python-input-0>", line 1
func(arg=x := foo())
^^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
I find this error pretty confusing. It's not clear why this is a syntax error or what users should do it fix it (i.e. add parentheses).
I propose adding a specialized syntax error to point users in the right direction, similar to what's currently done for assert:
>>> assert x := 1
File "<python-input-12>", line 1
assert x := 1
^^^^^^
SyntaxError: cannot use named expression without parentheses here
Refs #138716, #146260
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先重现 issue 中的示例,并阅读 CPython 对 assignment expressions 的语法错误处理,将其与现有针对 assert 的专用诊断进行比较。当无效的未加括号 assignment expressions 收到明确提示、引导用户使用括号,同时有效形式保留现有行为时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- compilers
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 58/100