`concurrent.futures.Executor.map` with `buffersize` should yield from buffer and raise after executor shutdown
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 36k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
As pointed by @salomvary in this discussion, the behavior of concurrent.futures.Executor.map with buffersize is misleading when iterating after the executor's shutdown. There is 2 cases:
- Create the generator, shut down the executor, start iterating:
with ThreadPoolExecutor(1) as executor:
iterator = executor.map(str, range(8), buffersize=2)
# start iterating after the shutdown
assert next(iterator) == "0"
assert next(iterator) == "1"
# raises StopIteration
next(iterator)
In this scenario the elements from the buffer are yielded, then the iteration is stopped.
- Create the generator, start the iteration, shut down the executor, continue the iteration
with ThreadPoolExecutor(1) as executor:
iterator = executor.map(str, range(8), buffersize=2)
# start iterating before the shutdown
assert next(iterator) == "0"
# raises "RuntimeError: cannot schedule new futures after shutdown"
next(iterator)
In this scenario a RuntimeError is raised by the first post-shutdown next, leaving not-yet-yielded results in the buffer.
I would vote for a mix of both: yield from the buffer and then raise the exception.
(the fix would be a dozen rows)
CPython versions tested on:
3.14, 3.15
Operating systems tested on:
macOS, Linux, Windows
Linked PRs
- gh-146395
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
使用 concurrent.futures.Executor.map 及其 buffersize 引數重現 issue 中的兩種 shutdown 情境。檢查 Executor.map 的迭代路徑,然後補充對在 shutdown 後例外發生之前 yield 已緩衝結果的涵蓋,並驗證現有範例的行為符合描述。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- backend
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 3/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-2 天
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 30/100