python / python/cpython

asyncio.subprocess spawning can block

Open
#146,181 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

stdlib topic-asyncio type-bug
Dominant language
Python
Stars
77.2k
Forks
35.9k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

Bug report

Bug description:

asyncio.create_subprocess_exec() and asyncio.create_subprocess_shell() call subprocess.Popen() synchronously on the event loop thread. Popen._execute_child() performs a blocking os.read() on a CLOEXEC error pipe (Lib/subprocess.py, current main line 1995) that doesn't return until the child completes execve(). This blocks the event loop for the duration of:

  1. fork() / posix_spawn() — page-table duplication proportional to parent process size
  2. Child-side setup (signal disposition, fd operations, chdir, uid/gid changes)
  3. execve() — kernel loads the binary, maps pages before applying O_CLOEXEC

The call chain on the event loop thread is:

_make_subprocess_transport()  [async — Lib/asyncio/unix_events.py:197]
  → _UnixSubprocessTransport.__init__()  [sync]
    → BaseSubprocessTransport.__init__()  [sync — Lib/asyncio/base_subprocess.py:40]
      → self._start()  [sync]
        → subprocess.Popen()  [sync]
          → _execute_child()  [sync — Lib/subprocess.py:1878]
            → os.read(errpipe_read, 50000)  [BLOCKS — line 1995]

In production, we have observed this blocking the event loop for multiple seconds when a Python process spawns a large binary (with a substantial statically-linked dependency set) on a system that was within operational parameters for memory usage (no ongoing swapping or similar) but subject to IO read contention slowing the binary-loading process.

The original python/asyncio#414 identified this in 2016; the asyncio repo was archived without resolution or migration to cpython's tracker.

#81444 would serve to fix this issue (by having asyncio.subprocess dispatch to a thread). However, I'm not sure it constitutes the only fix, or even an ideal fix — we should be able to watch for the FIFO either closing or having data available to read using natively asynchronous syscalls.


Observed in production on Python 3.13; determination that the issue still exists in 3.14 and current main based on source tree inspection.

CPython versions tested on:

3.13

Operating systems tested on:

Linux

Linked PRs
  • gh-154111

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Trace the call path from _make_subprocess_transport() in Lib/asyncio/unix_events.py through Lib/asyncio/base_subprocess.py and subprocess.Popen() in Lib/subprocess.py. Review the linked gh-154111 work before proceeding; completion should prevent subprocess startup from blocking the event loop and include regression coverage for the reported behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
operating-systems
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.