Use `PyObject_GetTypeData` without the GIL/attached thread state
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 35.9k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
In Cython we've historically let people do things like:
cdef class C:
cdef int non_object_attribute
def f(C c):
with nogil:
value = c.non_object_attribute
...
i.e. we've allowed them to get direct access into extension types without the GIL (providing they aren't manipulating Python objects).
When using PEP 697 lookup this becomes a little trickier because access to the attribute has to go through PyObject_GetTypeData. Looking at the implementation of PyObject_GetTypeData, it doesn't appear to need the GIL (except in debug mode where it sanity-checks the type).
I think I can work around this by calculating the offset of the struct myself once at startup (using PyObject_GetTypeData) and then doing all the lookups manually via the offset. It also looks like nanobind use a similar trick in places so I wouldn't be alone in this abuse of the system.
However, it'd be nice not to have to do this and if PyObject_GetTypeData could somehow be exempted from the "C API needs the GIL" rule.
I do understand that people would probably prefer not to do this, so I'm happy to look at other options.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
I asked about this in https://discuss.python.org/t/does-pyobject-gettypedata-need-the-gil/104637/4 - it only generated a small amount of discussion.
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
先閱讀 PyObject_GetTypeData 的實作,以及關於其是否需要 GIL 的連結 Discourse 討論。判斷對於 PEP 697 屬性存取,是否可能採用受支援的無 GIL 方法,並為 Cython 使用者記錄明確的結果或替代方案。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- c, python
- 領域
- api
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 32/100