Improve guidelines for GC protocol implementation for heap types
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 35.9k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/125962 which added some guidelines:
- Use
type->tp_allocinstead ofPyObject_NewandPyObject_GC_New. - Use
type->tp_freeinstead ofPyObject_FreeandPyObject_GC_Del.
Those two recommendations were introduced to facilitate adding the Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC flag to a heap type (those types must (should?) implement the GC protocol, at least according to the docs: https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/gcsupport.html#supporting-cycle-detection).
Now, the docs should indicate that:
type->tp_allocmay callPyObject_GC_Track, depending onPy_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC. Some users could be surprised by this (like me in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/138266).- https://docs.python.org/3.14/c-api/gcsupport.html#supporting-cycle-detection should be updated because it mentions using
PyObject_GC_New, which itself mentions usingtp_allocdirectly. Better to just mentiontp_alloc.
What I am actually worried about is:
Constructors for container types must conform to two rules:
- The memory for the object must be allocated using PyObject_GC_New or PyObject_GC_NewVar.
- Once all the fields which may contain references to other containers are initialized, it must call PyObject_GC_Track().
Now, tp_alloc automatically calls PyObject_GC_Track so users won't be able to pre-initialize fields, so I suggest that we mention this.
Outdated discussion
If people need to first initialize fields, maybe we should recommend constructing them first:
static PyObject *
object_new(PyTypeObject *type)
{
T *self = NULL;
PyObject *f1, *f2, *f3;
f1 = do1();
if (f1 == NULL) { goto error_pre_init; }
f2 = do2();
if (f2 == NULL) { goto error_pre_init; }
f3 = do3();
if (f3 == NULL) { goto error_pre_init; }
self = (T *)type->tp_alloc(type, 0);
if (self == NULL) {
goto error_pre_init;
}
self->f1 = f1;
self->f2 = f2;
self->f3 = f3;
f1 = f2 = f3 = NULL;
if (finalize(self) < 0) {
goto error;
}
return (PyObject *)self;
error_pre_init:
Py_XDECREF(f1);
Py_XDECREF(f2);
Py_XDECREF(f3);
return NULL;
error_post_init:
Py_DECREF(self);
return NULL;
}
cc @ZeroIntensity
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 docs.python.org/3.14/c-api/gcsupport.html 中的 C API 垃圾回收支持文档开始,尤其关注有关 tp_alloc、PyObject_GC_New 和 PyObject_GC_Track 的指导。更新指导,说明 tp_alloc 何时会跟踪对象,并在适当情况下使用 tp_alloc 而不是 PyObject_GC_New;当文档化的构造规则一致时即完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- c, python
- 领域
- documentation
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100