Differentiate bogus and normal comments in HTMLParser
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Métricas de merge de PRs
- Métricas de PR pendentes
Descrição
The HTML specs support three kinds of bogus comments:
<?...>.HTMLParsercallshandle_pi()for it.<!...>.HTMLParserused to callunknown_decl()for it, but now (after #9295) it callshandle_comment().</...>if no ASCII letter follows/.HTMLParsercallshandle_comment()for it.
And, of course, handle_comment() is called for normal comments <!--...--> and <!--...--!>. This includes abnormal cases <!--> and <!---> which are treated as empty comment <!---->.
It is now impossible to differentiate <![if !(IE)]> from </[if !(IE)]> and <!--[if !(IE)]-->. This may be important, even if they are the same comment from the point of view of the HTML specs.
It was proposed in #70197 to add a new handler handle_bogus_comment() which calls handle_comment() by default to differentiate bogus comments from normal comments. Additional information should be passed to it besides the comment value to differentiate different kinds of bogus comments. For example, the character preceding the comment value (?, ! or /). But since handle_pi() is already called for <?...> and unknown_decl() used to be called for <!...>, we can just restore the use of unknown_decl() and add a new handler for </...>.
The second way will partially revert #9295. The difference is that a bogus comment (unknown declaration) starting with <![ will be terminated by first > instead of ]> or ]]>, in accordance to the HTML specs.
The problem is that unknown_decl() is also called for valid CDATA section (and trailing ]] is omitted). According to the HTML specs, its content should be treated as normal text, so we could simply call handle_data() (as for resolved character references), but for flexibility we can call a special method.
cc @ezio-melotti
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Direção de pesquisa
Comece com HTMLParser e seus pontos de entrada handle_pi(), handle_comment(), unknown_decl() e handle_data(), depois revise as alternativas discutidas em #9295 e #70197. A tarefa estará concluída quando houver uma API e um comportamento acordados que distingam comentários normais, bogus e CDATA sem quebrar os handlers existentes.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- python
- Domínio
- web-dev
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Dificuldade
- 5/5
- Tempo estimado
- Mais de uma semana
- Status de atividade
- Estagnada
- Clareza
- Precisa de esclarecimento
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 25/100