unittest.mock: Double period in AttributeError message for invalid assertion methods
未关闭
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
stdlib
type-bug
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
When accessing a non-existent assertion method on a [Mock] object( e.g., assert_called_twice_with), the raised [AttributeError] message contains a double period (..) before the "Did you mean" suggestion.
Example
import unittest.mock as mock
m = mock.Mock()
m.assert_called_twice_with(1, 2)
Output
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/unittest/mock.py", line 665, in __getattr__
raise AttributeError(
AttributeError: 'assert_called_twice_with' is not a valid assertion. Use a spec for the mock if 'assert_called_twice_with' is meant to be an attribute.. Did you mean: 'assert_called_once_with'?
Problem
Note the double period ([attribute.. Did you mean] in the error message.
Expected Behavior
The error message should contain only a single period before the suggestion, e.g.:
Expected Output
AttributeError: 'assert_called_twice_with' is not a valid assertion. Use a spec for the mock if 'assert_called_twice_with' is meant to be an attribute. Did you mean: 'assert_called_once_with'?
CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PR
Linked PRs
- gh-137717
- gh-138111
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 unittest/mock.py 中的 Mock.getattr 开始,这是 traceback 中显示的入口点。检查现有的 unittest.mock 测试中针对无效断言方法的部分,并调整消息,使建议出现在一个句点之后;相关测试应确认修正后的 AttributeError 文本。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- testing-qa
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 1/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 新手友好度
- 25/100