python / python/cpython

unittest.mock: Double period in AttributeError message for invalid assertion methods

未关闭
#137,716 6 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

stdlib type-bug
主要语言
Python
星标
77.2k
派生
36k
PR 合并指标
PR 指标待抓取

描述

Bug report

Bug description:

When accessing a non-existent assertion method on a [Mock] object( e.g., assert_called_twice_with), the raised [AttributeError] message contains a double period (..) before the "Did you mean" suggestion.

Example

import unittest.mock as mock

m = mock.Mock()
m.assert_called_twice_with(1, 2)

Output

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/unittest/mock.py", line 665, in __getattr__
    raise AttributeError(
AttributeError: 'assert_called_twice_with' is not a valid assertion. Use a spec for the mock if 'assert_called_twice_with' is meant to be an attribute.. Did you mean: 'assert_called_once_with'?

Problem
Note the double period ([attribute.. Did you mean] in the error message.

Expected Behavior
The error message should contain only a single period before the suggestion, e.g.:

Expected Output

AttributeError: 'assert_called_twice_with' is not a valid assertion. Use a spec for the mock if 'assert_called_twice_with' is meant to be an attribute. Did you mean: 'assert_called_once_with'?
CPython versions tested on:

CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

Linux

Linked PR
Linked PRs
  • gh-137717
  • gh-138111

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 unittest/mock.py 中的 Mock.getattr 开始,这是 traceback 中显示的入口点。检查现有的 unittest.mock 测试中针对无效断言方法的部分,并调整消息,使建议出现在一个句点之后;相关测试应确认修正后的 AttributeError 文本。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
python
领域
testing-qa
Issue 类型
缺陷
难度
1/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
描述清楚
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。