python / python/cpython

properly define what "canonical" means in `os.path.realpath`

未關閉
#134,639 7 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

docs
主要語言
Python
星號
77.2k
分支
36k
PR 合併指標
PR 指標待擷取

描述

Documentation

The documentation says:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/2fd09b011031f3c00c342b44e02e2817010e507c/Doc/library/os.path.rst?plain=1#L406-L409

So it merely mentions symlink resolution, but not what else it means (if anything).

It does however mention that whatever it does is OS dependent:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/2fd09b011031f3c00c342b44e02e2817010e507c/Doc/library/os.path.rst?plain=1#L416-L418

IMO, it should be clearly documented what it does or at least:

  • what it guarantees to the least (For example will the pathname be absolute? Will it be normalised?)
    and/or:
  • which OS function it’s identical to, like on POSIX where that would probably realpath(), and whether there are differences to that

Especially since IMO "canonical" pathname (though I think it has no formal definition, or is there anything in POSIX?) means rather just that there are no symlinks left, i.e. that the file is "reached" by its true (=canonical) name.

But that could still be a relative pathname, and perhaps even one that is not normalised.

Cheers,
Chris.

Linked PRs
  • gh-134755

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

研究方向

從 Doc/library/os.path.rst 中引用的第 406-409 行和第 416-418 行開始,然後與 issue 中連結的 POSIX realpath() 參考文件進行比較。記錄 os.path.realpath 的最低保證,以及任何特定於作業系統的行為或差異,並確保措辭明確說明「canonical」的含義。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
python
領域
documentation
Issue 類型
文件
難度
2/5
預估耗時
1-3 小時
活躍度
停滯
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
35/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。