`asyncio.timeout(0)` swallows a prior task cancellation
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Métricas de PR pendientes
Descripción
Bug report
Bug description:
async with asyncio.timeout(0) will catch and process a prior unrelated cancellation of the enclosing task.
import asyncio
async def test(timeout):
task = asyncio.current_task()
task.cancel()
try:
async with asyncio.timeout(timeout):
await asyncio.sleep(1)
except TimeoutError:
print("timeout caught")
except asyncio.CancelledError:
print("CancelledError caught")
raise
await asyncio.sleep(2)
print("not cancelled")
asyncio.run(test(timeout=0)) # prints "timeout caught" and "not_cancelled"
This code prints timeout caught and not_cancelled, which means that asyncio.timeout(0) swallows the preceding task.cancel(), so the task pretty much ignores cancellation and proceeds.
Notably, that doesn't happen with a positive timeout. In the above example, asyncio.run(test(timeout=0.001)) will only print CancelledError caught, which I believe is the correct behavior.
In this case, asyncio.Timeout's internal timeout handler (_on_timeout) never gets to run, so the context manager doesn't interfere at all - it doesn't cancel/uncancel the task and simply passes CancelledError through.
Possible solution
I believe this behavior was unintentedly introduced in #102815, where the logic in __aexit__ was changed to only consider new cancel requests when deciding if it should raise a TimeoutError. That was necessary for Timeout to work correctly if used while handling a CancelledError, but now it can get confused between "internal" and "external" cancellations that happened on the same loop iteration.
I think we could capture task's _must_cancel flag when entering the context manager. If it was set, it means that CancelledError was supposed to be delivered and Timeout shouldn't mess with that attempt.
Draft PR to illustrate the idea: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/134472
Additional context
I've hit this issue in production with redis-py, which uses asyncio.timeout(0) internally in the connection parser:
# reduced for brevity
from redis.asyncio import Redis
async def test(timeout):
redis: Redis = await get_redis()
task = asyncio.current_task()
task.cancel()
await redis.set("foo", "bar")
assert False, "not cancelled"
CPython versions tested on:
3.12, 3.13, CPython main branch, 3.14, 3.11
Operating systems tested on:
macOS
Linked PRs
- gh-134472
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza con asyncio.Timeout.aexit y su manejador _on_timeout, y después revisa el borrador del PR #134472. Reproduce los ejemplos de timeout cero y timeout positivo; se considera terminado cuando una cancelación previa se propaga como CancelledError, mientras que el manejo de un timeout genuino sigue generando TimeoutError, con cobertura de regresión.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- backend
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 30/100