richcompare suppresses all errors raised from descriptors of comparison special methods
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 36k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
This is reporting possibly incorrect suppression of all errors generated by descriptors for the comparison special methods __eq__, __lt__, etc. (and possibly some other special methods). This only affects errors during the __get__ stage, while errors from the actual call propagate as expected.
I say possibly incorrect because I can see this being one of those sensitive underbellies that could affect existing behavior for some libraries. However, this seems inconsistent relative to some other special methods like __contains__, __bool__, etc., and since it suppresses all errors like SystemExit, MemoryError, KeyboardInterrupt, etc. it can hide underlying problems or behaviors that are hard to diagnose.
Minimal example
Minimal demonstration of the issue below is a descriptor which always raises an exception during __get__. The result of comparison through == returns False instead of raising the error. The type of error raised from __get__ is not important, it could have been from exit() or anything else down the stack. However, other special methods like __bool__ do raise the exception, as does directly accessing __eq__ as a method.
class BadDescriptor:
def __get__(self, obj, cls=None):
assert False
class BadBase:
__eq__ = BadDescriptor()
__bool__ = BadDescriptor()
b = BadBase()
print(f"{b == 1=}")
print(f"{b.__eq__(1)=}")
b == 1=False
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bad_descriptor.py", line 24, in <module>
print(f"{b.__eq__(1)=}")
^^^^^^^^
File "bad_descriptor.py", line 14, in __get__
assert False
^^^^^
AssertionError
Suspected cause and proposed resolution
The source of this behavior appears to be in Objects/typeobject.c function slot_tp_richcompare. Currently if an error occurs while getting the comparison method from a descriptor the error is cleared and NotImplemented is returned. Looking at some of the other special methods it seems like there is some inconsistency, some check for PyErr_Occurred and propagate the exception (EG slot_nb_bool), while others clear the error and default to some other action (E.G. slot_tp_repr).
if (func == NULL) {
PyErr_Clear();
Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED;
}
A couple experimental resolutions were attempted to look at the consequence. The first was to treat errors similar to slot_nb_bool, propagating them instead of suppressing.
if (func == NULL) {
if(PyErr_Occurred()){
return NULL;
}
Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED;
}
However, this caused a failed test which seems to be checking that raising AttributeError should lead to suppression and default comparison. It is not clear to me if that actually should be the expected behavior, and the comment in the test seems to indicate that it may actually be testing for some internal regression:
======================================================================
ERROR: testForExceptionsRaisedInInstanceGetattr2 (test.test_class.ClassTests.testForExceptionsRaisedInInstanceGetattr2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/cdodd/proj/contrib/cpython/Lib/test/test_class.py", line 592, in testForExceptionsRaisedInInstanceGetattr2
E() == E() # In debug mode, caused a C-level assert() to fail
^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/cdodd/proj/contrib/cpython/Lib/test/test_class.py", line 580, in booh
raise AttributeError("booh")
AttributeError: booh
But, as a compromise the following alternative checking specifically for AttributeError passes all tests enabled for my current platform. Depending on feedback here I am willing to contribute a pull request once I have a better idea as to what is expected/desired in these cases.
if (func == NULL) {
PyObject* exc = PyErr_Occurred();
if (exc != NULL){
if (PyErr_GivenExceptionMatches(exc, PyExc_AttributeError)){
// NOTE: suppresses only "attribute" errors
PyErr_Clear();
}else{
return NULL;
}
}
Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED;
}
CPython versions tested on:
3.14, CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-131187
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
從 Objects/typeobject.c 和 slot_tp_richcompare 開始,接著閱讀 test/test_class.py,尤其是 testForExceptionsRaisedInInstanceGetattr2 及其 booh helper。檢視連結的 PR gh-131187,並決定比較查找期間描述器錯誤的預期處理方式;完成的標準是行為已決定,且相關測試套件通過。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- c, python
- 領域
- compilers
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 4/5
- 預估耗時
- 3-5 天
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 30/100