Convert static initializers of `PyTypeObject`s to use C99 Designated (named) initializers

Named initializer are both easier to read and less error prone. There is AFAICT no downside to using them.

However, we have been historically reluctant to change code for purely maintenance. Personally, I think this leads to poorer code quality, but others value cleaner code history more.

In this case I think the readability and correctness advantages are such that we should make this change and accept the inconvenience in version control history.

As a motivating example, take the bool type, PyBool_Type:

PyTypeObject PyBool_Type = {
    PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
    "bool",
    offsetof(struct _longobject, long_value.ob_digit),  /* tp_basicsize */
    sizeof(digit),                              /* tp_itemsize */
    bool_dealloc,                               /* tp_dealloc */
    0,                                          /* tp_vectorcall_offset */
    0,                                          /* tp_getattr */
    0,                                          /* tp_setattr */
    0,                                          /* tp_as_async */
    bool_repr,                                  /* tp_repr */
    &bool_as_number,                            /* tp_as_number */
    0,                                          /* tp_as_sequence */
    0,                                          /* tp_as_mapping */
    0,                                          /* tp_hash */
    0,                                          /* tp_call */
    0,                                          /* tp_str */
    0,                                          /* tp_getattro */
    0,                                          /* tp_setattro */
    0,                                          /* tp_as_buffer */
    Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT,                         /* tp_flags */
    bool_doc,                                   /* tp_doc */
    0,                                          /* tp_traverse */
    0,                                          /* tp_clear */
    0,                                          /* tp_richcompare */
    0,                                          /* tp_weaklistoffset */
    0,                                          /* tp_iter */
    0,                                          /* tp_iternext */
    0,                                          /* tp_methods */
    0,                                          /* tp_members */
    0,                                          /* tp_getset */
    &PyLong_Type,                               /* tp_base */
    0,                                          /* tp_dict */
    0,                                          /* tp_descr_get */
    0,                                          /* tp_descr_set */
    0,                                          /* tp_dictoffset */
    0,                                          /* tp_init */
    0,                                          /* tp_alloc */
    bool_new,                                   /* tp_new */
    .tp_vectorcall = bool_vectorcall,
};

There are a lot of zeros, and a lot of comments to make sure we have the right number of zeros. If one is missing, things go wrong.
Contrast that with the C99 version:

PyTypeObject PyBool_Type = {
    PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
    .tp_name = "bool",
    .tp_basicsize = offsetof(struct _longobject, long_value.ob_digit),
    .tp_itemsize = sizeof(digit),
    .tp_flags = Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT,

    .tp_as_number  = &bool_as_number, 
    .tp_base = &PyLong_Type, 
    .tp_dealloc  = bool_dealloc,  
    .tp_doc = bool_doc,
    .tp_new = bool_new,
    .tp_repr = bool_repr,
    .tp_vectorcall = bool_vectorcall,
};

The code is self describing (no need for comments naming the fields) and is much less error prone. The fields can listed in any order, in this case with the core field first, then the optional fields alphabetically.

首先在 CPython 源代码中定位 PyBool_Type 和其他静态 PyTypeObject 初始化器，然后将它们的字段顺序与 PyTypeObject 定义进行比较。在保留其值的同时，将这些初始化器转换为 C99 指定字段；当受影响的代码能够使用新的初始化语法成功构建时，即视为完成。