Should `socketserver.BaseServer` have abstract methods?
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 36k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
socketserver.BaseServer is documented to have the methods fileno, get_request, and server_bind, but it doesn't actually have these. They're implemented on the subclass TCPServer instead, and TCPServer is the only direct subclass of BaseServer in the standard library. Of the three methods, get_request is the only one called within any existing methods of BaseServer.
This seems like a situation where BaseServer is acting as an ABC with these methods expected to be implemented by any subclass. Abstract methods weren't available yet when socketserver was added. Does it make sense to use them now? I couldn't find anyone suggesting this on the issue tracker or on discuss.python.org, so I don't know if this has been considered and rejected before, or never really considered.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
- gh-127976
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
從 socketserver.BaseServer 和 TCPServer 進入點開始,重點關注 fileno、get_request 和 server_bind,以及 BaseServer 目前如何使用它們。檢視連結的 PR gh-127976,並判斷將這些方法設為抽象方法是否保留文件化的子類別契約;達成具有相應實作和驗證的文件化決定即表示完成。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- networking
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 25/100