GC: Implementation does not match behavior documented on `gc.set_threshold`

Bug report

Bug description:

The documentation of gc.set_threshold states:

In order to decide when to run, the collector keeps track of the number object allocations and deallocations since the last collection. When the number of allocations minus the number of deallocations exceeds threshold0, collection starts

This doesn't seem to be accurate. Looking at the implementation, it appears that young.count is being used to track number of allocations minus the number of deallocations. However it doesn't actually track this due to the if (gcstate->young.count > 0) check here: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.13/Python/gc.c#L2119.

As a concrete example, suppose threshold0=500. Suppose the GC runs and young.count is reset to 0, then 500 deallocations happen (by object ref counts dropping to 0), then 500 allocations happen. According to the documentation the GC would not run in this case, because the difference between allocations and deallocations is 0. However the actual tracked number in young.count will be 500, and GC will trigger.

I'm unsure which is the expected behavior; the documented one or the implemented one, but it does appear that the two do not currently agree.

CPython versions tested on:

3.13

Operating systems tested on:

macOS

Linked PRs

• gh-156877

Comience con el comportamiento documentado de gc.set_threshold y el manejo de young.count en Python/gc.c alrededor de la línea 2119. Compare el escenario de asignación y desasignación descrito con la implementación y, a continuación, revise el PR vinculado gh-156877; se considera terminado cuando la implementación y la documentación coinciden en el comportamiento previsto del umbral.