GC - Possible to indefinitely prevent collection of generation-1 objects by calling gc.collect(0) often
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Bug report
Bug description:
The example below will die from memory exhaustion, despite nearly all objects being eligible for collection and despite garbage collection not being disabled. See inline comments for an explanation of what I think is happening:
import gc
from typing import Any
class Temp:
def __init__(self):
# Cyclic reference to prevent deletion by ref count dropping to 0.
self._x = self
# Allocate a bunch of memory so that the process will die if
# collection doesn't happen.
self.memory = bytearray(1024*1024*512)
# Set some low thresholds so that collection should occur often.
gc.set_threshold(100, 3, 3)
while True:
ref = Temp()
# Promote the new Temp() object to generation-1. I think this is also resetting
# the GCs view of how many objects were allocated at the "last collection". If
# that's true, it will effectively stop the GC from ever being invoked
# automatically, even though we're accumulating more and more objects,
# because `threshold0` will never be exceeded.
gc.collect(0)
del ref
# Temp() is now in generation-1 and eligible for collection, but gc.collect(1)
# is never triggered, because there are no automatically invoked GCs at all.
# Here we log the number of generation-1 objects, which continues to increase
# until the process dies.
print("Number of generation 1 objects: ", len(gc.get_objects(generation=1)))
Commenting out only the gc.collect(0) allows the Temp objects to be collected, and the process to run indefinitely. The fact that removing an explicit GC actually enables more GC to happen seems broken.
If what I think is happening is what's happening, then perhaps manually invoked GCs should not reset the GC's view on how many objects were allocated at the "last collection", since that would be what's effectively disabling the automatically triggered GCs (and hence the GCs at higher generations) from running.
CPython versions tested on:
3.11
Operating systems tested on:
macOS
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file or test is named. Start by running the provided reproducer on CPython 3.11 and trace the behavior of gc.collect(0), automatic collection thresholds, and generation-1 growth. Done means confirming the reported interaction and adding an appropriate regression test and fix if the behavior is verified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100