Dramatic slowdown with random.random on free-threading build.

This slowdown was found with one of my favorite benchmarks, which is calculating the pi value with the Monte Carlo method.

import os
import random
import time
from threading import Thread

def monte_carlo_pi_part(n: int, idx: int, results: list[int]) -> None:
    count = 0
    for i in range(n):
        x = random.random()
        y = random.random()

        if x*x + y*y <= 1:
            count += 1
    results[idx] = count


n = 10000
threads = []
num_threads = 100
results = [0] * num_threads
a = time.time()
for i in range(num_threads):
    t = Thread(target=monte_carlo_pi_part, args=(n, i, results))
    t.start()
    threads.append(t)

while threads:
    t = threads.pop()
    t.join()

b = time.time()
print(sum(results) / (n * num_threads) * 4)
print(b-a)

Acquiring critical sections for random methods causes this slowdown.
Removing @critical_section from the method, which uses genrand_uint32 and then updating genrand_uint32 to use atomic operation makes the performance acceptable.

Linked PRs

• gh-118393
• gh-118396

Comece lendo a implementação de random.random e o caminho genrand_uint32, incluindo o uso de @critical_section descrito na issue. Em seguida, reproduza o benchmark de Monte Carlo multithread fornecido e revise as PRs vinculadas 118393 e 118396; considera-se concluído quando a degradação de desempenho do free-threading for reduzida sem alterar a correção dos números aleatórios.