Allow JSONEncoder to handle passing unsupported dict keys through `.default()` before throwing TypeError
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- Métricas de merge de PRs
- Métricas de PR pendentes
Descrição
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
Encoding a dict to JSON raises TypeError if a key is not one of the simple types natively supported by JSON (bool, None, int, float, str).
However, some other types of objects are "JSON-like" enough that users commonly use them as keys, and it would be handy to be able to dump such dicts to JSON format. For values, this is supported via the encoder's .default() method, but for keys there isn't a current way to accomplish this other than manually processing the dict to convert all such keys before passing it to JSONEncoder. It can't be handled in .default() as a dict doesn't get passed to .default().
Example objects that are not simple types but used as keys (I've used all these myself):
to_encode = {
b"foobar": "bytes key",
pathlib.Path("/tmp"): "Path key",
uuid.uuid4(): "UUID key",
ipaddress.ip_address("127.0.0.1"): "IP address key",
}
Calling json.dumps() on such a dict will raise TypeError: keys must be str, int, float, bool or None, not bytes, even if you try to subclass JSONEncoder and handle a dict's keys in .default().
I have a patch that adds an optional kwarg convert_keys that, when set, causes the encoder to pass such keys through the encoder's .default() method, and only raise an exception if that does not return one of the JSON-supported types. It defaults to off, and skipkeys still takes precedence over the new setting, so existing uses will see no change in behaviour.
I did search for discussions of this, but didn't find anything related, only other proposals like adding a JSON dunder method so any object can control its JSON serialization, which is a different approach. I believe my approach is much more similar to the way values are currently handled, and will therefore be more familiar to users.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
- gh-117392
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Direção de pesquisa
Comece pelo tratamento de chaves de JSONEncoder do Python e pelo caminho default() existente; a issue não nomeia nenhum arquivo de origem nem teste. Revise o PR vinculado gh-117392 e confirme que a conversão opcional de chaves preserve o comportamento existente, respeite skipkeys e gere erro somente quando a conversão não produzir um tipo de chave compatível com JSON.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- python
- Domínio
- backend
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Dificuldade
- 4/5
- Tempo estimado
- 3-5 dias
- Status de atividade
- Estagnada
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 25/100