python / python/cpython

Stack trace of re-raised exception is wrong

Offen
#116,862 5 Kommentare 2 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

docs interpreter-core type-bug
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
77.2k
Forks
36k
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
PR-Kennzahlen ausstehend

Beschreibung

Bug report

Bug description:

If you catch an exception and hold on to it for later handling, and then re-raise the exception, the stack trace is wrong (the stack is a blend of the two stacks).

A simple example:

def err_returning_call() -> Exception:
    try:
        raise ValueError('foo')
    except Exception as err:
        return err

def raise_err(err):
    raise err

err = err_returning_call()

raise_err(err)

Produces a traceback with:

$ python simplest_cpython_bug.py 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "example.py", line 14, in <module>
    raise_err(err)
    ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "example.py", line 10, in raise_err
    raise err
  File "example.py", line 3, in err_returning_call
    raise ValueError('foo')
ValueError: foo

Note that the previously caught exception (raise err) produces a traceback that mixes the original stack and the new stack, rather than a clean traceback from the point where it is re-raised.


Raising the exception from another (adapting err_returning_call to raise ValueError('another') from err) produces a logical stack trace:

$ ./build/bin/python3 simplest_cpython_bug.py 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "example.py", line 3, in err_returning_call
    raise ValueError('foo')
ValueError: foo

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "example.py", line 14, in <module>
    raise_err(err)
    ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "example.py", line 10, in raise_err
    raise ValueError('another') from err
ValueError: another

The deeper the stacks, the more confusing the tb. It also seems to drop an important step in the traceback (even if we use the raise new_error from original_error pattern):

def root_call():
    return err_returning_call()

def err_returning_call() -> Exception:
    try:
        error_raising()
    except Exception as err:
        return err

def error_raising():
    raise ValueError('foo')


err = root_call()


def raise_err(err):
    raise err

def indirect_raise_err(err):
    raise_err(err)


indirect_raise_err(err)

With the result:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "example.py", line 24, in <module>
    indirect_raise_err(err)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "example.py", line 21, in indirect_raise_err
    raise_err(err)
    ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "example.py", line 18, in raise_err
    raise err
  File "example.py", line 6, in err_returning_call
    error_raising()
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "example.py", line 11, in error_raising
    raise ValueError('foo')
ValueError: foo

Note that with the raise from included, the traceback is:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "example.py", line 6, in err_returning_call
    error_raising()
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "example.py", line 11, in error_raising
    raise ValueError('foo')
ValueError: foo

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "example.py", line 24, in <module>
    indirect_raise_err(err)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "example.py", line 21, in indirect_raise_err
    raise_err(err)
    ~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "example.py", line 18, in raise_err
    raise ValueError('bar') from err
ValueError: bar

Notice how even in this case, the original traceback is missing the root_call call (possibly reasonable?).

The expected behaviour would be to simply raise the exception with the stack trace of the final raise call. This would be analogous to what happens when you capture an exception in a variable without raising it:

exception = ValueError('not raised directly')

raise exception

Which produces the following traceback:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/media/important/github/python/cpython/./exception_var.py", line 3, in <module>
    raise exception
ValueError: not raised directly

This report is against main (at 2cf18a4430 - the latest commit on 15/3/2024), but applies all the way back to Python 3.7 at least.

CPython versions tested on:

3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

Linux

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Rechercherichtung

Start by reproducing the behavior with the issue's err_returning_call, raise_err, and indirect_raise_err examples across the described CPython versions. Trace how a caught exception's traceback changes when it is raised again, and compare that with raising a newly created exception. Done means a re-raised exception reports only the final raise call while explicit exception chaining retains the expected separate tracebacks.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
python
Bereich
backend
Issue-Typ
Bug
Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Aktivitätsstatus
Veraltet
Klarheit
Klar beschrieben
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
35/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.