Docs need support for a multiversion changed/added marker.
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 558
描述
Documentation
We have .. versionchanged:: NUMERIC TEXT and .. versionadded:: NUMERIC TEXT support in our ReST docs.
But I believe it must be a single numeric value/word to render meaningfully? What we lack is the less commonly needed ability to specify multiple versions at once. Typically for a subset of security fix backports.
Today's common practice has been to just list the relevant version from the branch being committed to (example: in main 3.12 today, in 3.11: 3.11.99, etc.) with a manual change to the docs required within each backport PR.
This is somewhat unsatisfactory for documentation readers: People often link to and read the latest /3/ docs on the website regardless of the Python version they are using. Where a version marker saying something happened in a specific release often ignores that the change was back-ported to older releases. Meaning people may not realize that unless they happen to bother loading the older version specific documentation.
note: Adding multi-version support in the tags wouldn't address the manual PR change on back-port issue (references to future versions in changed/added markers don't belong there... unless we could we auto-filter those out based on version number at doc compilation time?) - but that, or better, automating initial version population into those fields from the surrounding codebase, belongs in a separate feature request.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先检查现有的 ReST versionchanged 和 versionadded 指令,以及它们如何渲染版本值。定义多版本的语法和渲染行为,包括已回移植的安全修复以及过滤未来版本;完成的标准是文档能够显示每个适用的 release,且无需手动消除歧义。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- documentation
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100