Provide packagers with clarification on pythonhosted.org

One question that I'm sure newcomers to packaging have is, "where should I host my documentation?" or "is there an official or preferred place to host my documentation?" (I sure had this question.)

Of course, PyPI displays the package's "long_description" (which is also worth mentioning in the guide), but PyPI also says this on the edit page for a package--

You can now host documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/project_name. To upload documentation, prepare a .zip file that is unpacked into this URL. Only static pages are supported. The zip file must have a top-level "index.html".

I know the Guide tries to avoid taking sides on third-party tools (e.g. test frameworks, etc). But given that pythonhosted.org is owned by PSF and recommended by PyPI, is this a candidate for a recommendation (e.g. on the "Tool Recommendations" page)?

Since pythonhosted.org is more a service rather than a tool, perhaps the page title could be changed to "Tool & Service Recommendations." (PyPI itself is another service that is implicitly recommended on the page; it doesn't have its own bullet point but could under a "Services" section for completeness and clarity.)

Beginne mit der im Issue verlinkten Seite „Tool Recommendations“ und prüfe, wie sie PyPI und andere Empfehlungen derzeit beschreibt. Ermittle, ob pythonhosted.org dokumentiert werden sollte und ob der Seitentitel geändert werden sollte; abgeschlossen, wenn der Leitfaden eine einvernehmliche, klare Empfehlung für Einsteiger in die Paketierung enthält.