posit-dev / posit-dev/rsconnect-python
Generate a Python version requirement for requirements.txt-only projects
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 37
- Forks
- 28
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 3 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 7
Beschreibung
Problem
For Python projects that contain requirements.txt but do not contain a
.python-version, pyproject.toml with project.requires-python, or
setup.cfg with python_requires, rsconnect-python generates a manifest with
only the exact local interpreter version:
{
"python": {
"version": "3.11.9"
}
}
It does not generate environment.python.requires.
This is likely the most common project layout for Python content deployed to
Posit Connect. The generated manifest therefore relies on the legacy
python.version field rather than expressing the content's compatibility as a
version constraint. This can prevent Connect from rebuilding content with a
different available Python version, particularly when exact version matching
is enabled.
Current behavior
Environment.create_python_environment() detects a requirement only from:
.python-versionpyproject.toml→project.requires-pythonsetup.cfg→python_requires
When none is present, python_version_requirement remains None.
Manifest consequently omits environment.python.requires, while
python.version is populated with the full version of the interpreter used for
environment inspection.
Proposed behavior
When no explicit Python requirement is found, derive a major/minor-compatible
requirement from the inspected interpreter and include it in the manifest.
For example, packaging with Python 3.11.9 could produce:
{
"python": {
"version": "3.11.9"
},
"environment": {
"python": {
"requires": "~=3.11.0"
}
}
}
An explicit requirement from .python-version, pyproject.toml, or
setup.cfg should continue to take precedence.
The exact fallback constraint syntax is open for discussion, but it should
allow Connect to select an available compatible patch release while preserving
the deployed interpreter's major/minor version.
Motivation
requirements.txt-only projects are common.- Users should not need to add unrelated packaging metadata solely to obtain
appropriate Python version matching. - Connect should be able to rebuild content with another compatible Python
installation when the original patch release is unavailable. - This would make the default behavior consistent with the intent of
environment.python.requires.
Related work
- #648 added support for
environment.python.requireswhen a constraint is
explicitly available. - #659 addressed adapting
.python-versionvalues into version constraints. - posit-dev/connect#43572 contains a recent discussion of Connect rebuilding
content after supported Python installations change.
Acceptance criteria
- A Python project containing only
requirements.txtgets an
environment.python.requiresfallback derived from the inspected
interpreter. - The fallback matches compatible patch releases within the same major/minor
version. - Explicit project constraints continue to override the fallback.
- Generated manifests retain
python.versionfor backward compatibility. - Tests cover requirements-only projects and explicit-constraint precedence.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginnen Sie mit Environment.create_python_environment() und dem im Issue beschriebenen Manifest-Generierungspfad. Verfolgen Sie, wie Anforderungen erkannt werden und wie python_version_requirement zu environment.python.requires gelangt, und fügen Sie dann Testabdeckung für Projekte hinzu, die nur requirements enthalten, sowie für die Priorität expliziter Einschränkungen. Erledigt bedeutet, dass der Fallback python.version beibehält, kompatible Patch-Releases zulässt und explizite Einschränkungen weiterhin Vorrang haben.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- cli, tooling
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 64/100