[FEATURE]: autorangePadding
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 18.8k
- 派生
- 2.8k
- 平均合并
- 16 小时 26 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 21
描述
[FEATURE]: autorangePadding — Explicit Control and Introspection of Autorange Padding
Summary
When autorange: true is set on an axis, Plotly silently adds a padding fraction
around the data range. This padding is internally computed, never documented as a
configurable value, and impossible to query without using full_figure_for_development().
This issue proposes:
- A new per-axis layout attribute
autorangePaddingto give users explicit control
over the padding fraction - Exposure of the computed padding via
get_computed_values()for introspection
Problem Statement
Autorange padding causes subtle but persistent issues in several common workflows:
Problem 1 — Multi-figure axis alignment:
Two figures sharing a conceptual x-axis (e.g. a price chart above a volume chart)
will not align perfectly even when their data ranges are identical, because autorange
applies padding independently on each figure. There is no way to force consistent
padding without disabling autorange entirely.
Problem 2 — Controlled range extension:
A user wants autorange but needs extra space on one side for an annotation or legend.
Currently this is impossible without computing the full data range manually and setting
a fixed range — defeating the purpose of autorange.
Problem 3 — Range introspection in production:
Users who need the exact rendered axis range must use full_figure_for_development(),
which is explicitly documented as not for production use. There is no lightweight
alternative.
Proposed Solution
1. New Layout Attribute: autorangePadding
Set per axis as a fraction of the total data range:
fig.update_layout(
xaxis=dict(
autorange=True,
autorangePadding=0.05 # 5% padding each side — matches current default behavior
),
yaxis=dict(
autorange=True,
autorangePadding=0.0 # no padding — data fills axis edge to edge
)
)
Default value matches the current implicit behavior so all existing figures are
unaffected.
Asymmetric Padding
For cases where padding is only needed on one side:
fig.update_layout(
yaxis=dict(
autorange=True,
autorangePadding=dict(before=0.0, after=0.15) # extra headroom at top only
)
)
before = lower end of the axis, after = upper end, regardless of axis direction.
2. Introspection via get_computed_values()
computed = fig.get_computed_values(include=["axis_ranges", "autorange_padding"])
Returns:
{
"axis_ranges": {
"xaxis": [-0.5, 10.5],
"yaxis": [-4.35, 102.1]
},
"autorange_padding": {
"xaxis": {
"before": 0.05,
"after": 0.05,
"pixels": {"before": 18.4, "after": 18.4}
},
"yaxis": {
"before": 0.05,
"after": 0.05,
"pixels": {"before": 14.2, "after": 14.2}
}
}
}
Both fractional and pixel values are returned, making the result useful for
data-space alignment and pixel-space layout work respectively.
3. Companion Utility: match_axis_ranges() (Optional)
A natural extension that syncs axis ranges across multiple figures:
import plotly.utils as pu
pu.match_axis_ranges([fig1, fig2], axis="x")
Computes the union of both figures' data ranges and applies a consistent range to both
so they align exactly — the most common use case motivating this feature.
Relationship to get_computed_values()
This feature is a direct extension of the get_computed_values() proposal:
axis_rangesalready proposes returning the final rendered rangeautorange_paddingextends that with a breakdown of how much of the range is
padding vs. actual data spanautorangePaddingis the write-side complement to the read-side introspection
Together they give full round-trip control: set the padding you want, then verify
exactly what was applied.
Prior Art
| Tool | Equivalent |
|---|---|
matplotlib |
ax.margins(x=0.05) sets padding; ax.get_xlim() returns final range |
Vega-Lite |
Explicit "padding" property on scale definitions |
D3.js |
scale.nice() and direct scale.domain() control |
Backward Compatibility
autorangePaddingis a new optional attribute. Omitting it preserves current behavior exactly.- No existing figures, layouts, or workflows are affected unless users explicitly opt in.
Acceptance Criteria
-
autorangePaddingaccepted as a per-axis layout attribute (scalar or asymmetric dict) - Default value matches current implicit padding so existing figures are unchanged
- Computed padding values returned via
get_computed_values(include=["autorange_padding"]) - Both fractional and pixel padding values included in the return
- Documented in the axis layout attribute reference
-
match_axis_ranges()utility considered as a follow-up or included in scope
Related Issues
- Companion to:
[FEATURE]: get_computed_values()(https://github.com/plotly/plotly.py/issues/5552) - Companion to:
[FEATURE]: get_subplot_geometry()(https://github.com/plotly/plotly.py/issues/5554) - Related to any issue requesting consistent axis ranges across multiple figures
I am happy to discuss the naming convention for
autorangePaddingvsautorange_padding
to match the existing attribute style guide, and whether thematch_axis_ranges()
utility belongs in this issue or a separate one.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先查看 issue 5552 中相关的 get_computed_values() 提案,以及现有的轴布局属性参考。明确 autorangePadding、计算值内省和可选的 match_axis_ranges() 工具的范围。完成的标准是:在不改变现有默认行为的情况下,实现、测试并记录已达成一致的验收标准。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- data-visualization
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100