Inconsistent `gap` attributes causes misalignment

If you provide both bargap and scattergap but they're different, traces in the same alignment and offset group do not properly align. One way or another, ensuring these traces align is more important than honoring both gaps. Here, the orange and green scatter points should be centered on the bars of the same color, but they are not:

https://codepen.io/alexcjohnson/pen/yLdEZvo?editors=0010

This is a little tricky though:

• If there are no bar traces, bargap will not be defined, so scattergap should be honored.
• Even if there are bar traces but only scattergap is explicitly given, seems like it should be honored and used as the bargap value as well.
• There are also boxgap and violingap - in principle you could have ALL of these traces in the same alignment and offset groups, do we define a hierarchy, something like bar beats scatter beats box beats violin? Or do we take the gap from the first trace in the group, and use that for all traces in that group? Or the maximum gap that applies to any trace in the group? I have no strong opinions here, so long as the result is always proper alignment.
• All but scatter also have *groupgap attributes. There's no problem allowing these to be different.

Inizia dalla gestione dell’allineamento e dei gruppi di offset per le trace bar, scatter, box e violin, e riproduci la discrepanza usando il CodePen collegato. Confronta i casi con attributi gap mancanti o impostati esplicitamente, quindi stabilisci una regola coerente per scegliere il gap condiviso mantenendo il corretto allineamento. Il lavoro è completato quando le trace negli stessi gruppi sono centrate correttamente in tutte le combinazioni di trace rilevanti.