Ref counting based object release is not applied if cycle is broken in destructor during GC run
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- C
- 星标
- 40.4k
- 派生
- 8.1k
- 平均合并
- 2 天 13 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 96
描述
Description
repro: https://3v4l.org/USrWu
see UPDATE below
It seems the GC can be improved. Currently, when a cycle is broken during GC run, a 2nd run of GC is needed to really release the object.
https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/b58d74547f "solves this issue" since PHP 8.2+, but is that the most efficient solution for everything? If a cycle (all cycles/references to an object) is explicitly broken during GC, is there anything againts releasing that object by standard refcounting?
Resulted in this output:
d
gc
bool(true) <- notice object is kept alive after the destructor has broken the cycle (and refcount dropped to 0)
gc rerun
bool(false)
bool(false)
done
But I expected this output instead:
d
gc
bool(false)
gc rerun
bool(false)
bool(false)
done
UPDATE:
Based on https://3v4l.org/mgoqd I would call this a bug as 2nd WeakReference::get() call is expected to always give the same result if no GC is run in between the calls.
PHP Version
any (tested PHP 7.4, 8.3)
Operating System
any
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先运行 https://3v4l.org/USrWu 中的复现,并将其与 https://3v4l.org/mgoqd 中更新后的示例进行比较,重点关注 GC、析构函数、引用计数和 WeakReference::get()。当在一次 GC 运行期间断开的循环能够立即释放对象,使两个 WeakReference 检查都与预期输出一致且无需第二次运行 GC 时,即可视为完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- c
- 领域
- backend
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100