paritytech / paritytech/try-runtime-cli
Configurable block format
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
good first issue
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 25
- Forks
- 29
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
See https://github.com/paritytech/try-runtime-cli/pull/6#discussion_r1293245156
I'm unsure what the priority is at the moment, trying to gauge how common it is for parachains to use something other than node_primitives::Block.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the discussion in pull request #6, especially comment discussion_r1293245156, and examine how try-runtime-cli currently uses node_primitives::Block. First determine whether parachains commonly use another block type; done would require an agreed scope and a configurable block format.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- blockchain, cli
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100