ome / ome/openmicroscopy

Release process review

Open
#6,330 4 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Java
Stars
222
Forks
105
Avg merge
2h 21m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

During the recent release, a few "sticky" points were noticed making the release a bit more complicated than necessary
Below is a list of points to consider with potential solutions

cc @sbesson @joshmoore

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the linked .github/workflows/gradle.yml, OMERO-DEV-release-artifacts and OMERO-DEV-release jobs, and the release-process documentation. Compare the linked automation pull requests and the linux/step04_all_omero_install.sh entry point. Done should mean a defined release scope with automated artifact, dependency, documentation, redirect, and installation steps, plus updated process documentation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
github-actions, java, shell
Domain
ci-cd, devops, documentation, release
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.