"labels" metadata section is confusing (and wrong?)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 171
- Forks
- 75
- Avg merge
- 2d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 20
Description
I am pretty confused by the "labels" metadata section:
It looks like this specifies the path to the first scale array. However, it would make much more sense to me if this specified the group with multiscales metadata for the label image.
I.e. instead of {"labels": ["orphaned/0"]} I would expect {"labels": ["orphaned"]}. Is this maybe just wrong?
On a sidenote: why do you call it orphaned? I think for labels something like mask or my-fancy-mask would make more sense as an example name.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the linked labels metadata section and its surrounding multiscales definitions; compare the documented orphaned/0 example with the proposed orphaned path. Done means the specification's labels path semantics and example naming are explicitly resolved and documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100