fs: fs.link() on exFAT volumes (Windows) fails with misleading EISDIR instead of "not supported"
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- JavaScript
- 星标
- 122k
- 派生
- 37.4k
- 平均合并
- 4 天 3 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 272
描述
- Version: v24.19.0
- Platform: Windows 11 Home (10.0.22631), x64 — NTFS system drive; two USB exFAT volumes (4TB / 2TB)
- Subsystem: fs
What is wrong?
fs.linkSync(src, dest) targeting a file on an exFAT volume fails with errno EISDIR ("illegal operation on a directory"). The destination path does not exist and is not a directory. The real reason is that exFAT does not support hard links, and the underlying Win32 error is ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION (WinError 1).
The EISDIR diagnosis actively misleads: it sends developers hunting for a directory that isn't there, instead of pointing at the unsupported filesystem operation.
Reproduction
On an exFAT-formatted volume (e.g. X:\):
$ node -e "require('fs').linkSync('X:\\a.tmp','X:\\b.tmp')"
Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, link 'X:\a.tmp' -> 'X:\b.tmp'
Python cross-check on the same volume shows the true underlying Win32 error:
$ python -c "import os; os.link(r'X:\a.tmp', r'X:\b.tmp')"
OSError: [WinError 1] 函数不正确。 (ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION)
Observations from our test matrix (single machine, Windows 11 build 22631, Node v24.19.0):
| Target volume | Filesystem | fs.linkSync result |
|---|---|---|
| C:, D:, F: | NTFS | succeeds |
| E: (USB), H: (USB) | exFAT | always fails with EISDIR |
The failure splits perfectly along filesystem type, independent of internal/USB. Reads are unaffected; plain file writes work fine on exFAT.
Expected behavior
When CreateHardLinkW fails with ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION on a filesystem without hard-link support, Node/libuv should surface a meaningful errno — e.g. ENOSYS ("function not implemented"), EPERM, or EOPNOTSUPP — rather than EISDIR.
For reference, on Linux, link(2) on filesystems that do not support hard links reports EPERM/EOPNOTSUPP, and on a system without the syscall at all ENOSYS.
Hypothesis (for upstream to confirm)
Possibly a missing mapping for ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION in libuv's win32 uv_translate_sys_error, letting the failed uv_fs_link fall through to a misleading errno. We have not traced the exact layer; we only report the observed mapping WinError 1 (ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION) → EISDIR.
Context / impact
This surfaced while diagnosing a third-party agent tool that publishes files via temp-file + hard-link: on exFAT drives every write failed, and the EISDIR message misattributed the cause. Reported downstream at https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness/discussions/5704 (includes the consumer-side analysis and a fallback-to-rename mitigation).
exFAT is the factory default format for many USB drives and SD cards, so "write to my external drive" is a common end-user scenario that hits this.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
沿着 Windows CreateHardLinkW 路径跟踪 fs.link 和 uv_fs_link,然后检查 libuv 针对 ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION 的 uv_translate_sys_error 映射。通过在 exFAT 上复现来确认该映射,并添加覆盖所得 errno 的回归测试;完成的标准是该错误不再报告 EISDIR,并能识别出不支持的操作。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- javascript, node.js
- 领域
- operating-systems
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 55/100