nodejs / nodejs/node

sea: `--build-sea` produces a segfaulting executable on macOS x64 (v26.7.0), while the blob + postject path works on the same runtime

Abierto
#65,479 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Lenguaje dominante
JavaScript
Estrellas
122k
Forks
37.3k
Merge medio
4 d 2 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
283

Descripción

Version

v26.7.0

Platform
Darwin 24.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 24.6.0 x86_64
macOS 15.7.3 (24G419), Intel Core i5-7500
Subsystem

sea

What steps will reproduce the bug?

On macOS x64, an executable produced by node --build-sea segfaults on launch — including
for a one-line hello world. The same runtime, given the same script through
--experimental-sea-config + postject, produces an executable that runs.

$ echo 'console.log("hello");' > hello.js

# --build-sea
$ printf '{"main":"hello.js","output":"a-build-sea","disableExperimentalSEAWarning":true}' > a.json
$ node --build-sea a.json
Generated single executable .../bin/node + a.json -> a-build-sea
$ codesign --remove-signature a-build-sea && codesign --sign - a-build-sea
$ ./a-build-sea
Segmentation fault: 11        # exit 139

# the blob path, same node, same script
$ printf '{"main":"hello.js","output":"hello.blob","disableExperimentalSEAWarning":true}' > blob.json
$ node --experimental-sea-config blob.json
Wrote single executable preparation blob to hello.blob
$ cp "$(command -v node)" d-postject && chmod 755 d-postject
$ npx postject d-postject NODE_SEA_BLOB hello.blob \
    --sentinel-fuse NODE_SEA_FUSE_fce680ab2cc467b6e072b8b5df1996b2 \
    --macho-segment-name NODE_SEA --overwrite
$ codesign --remove-signature d-postject && codesign --sign - d-postject
$ ./d-postject
hello                          # exit 0
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Every time, on this host. Not conditional on anything in the config:

variant result
--build-sea, CommonJS (no mainFormat) SIGSEGV
--build-sea, "mainFormat": "module" SIGSEGV
--build-sea, no codesign step at all SIGSEGV
--experimental-sea-config + postject, same node runs

So it is neither the module format nor the ad-hoc signature.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

node --build-sea should produce a runnable executable — it is documented as the
single-command replacement for the blob + postject procedure, and the procedure it
replaces works on this exact runtime.

What do you see instead?

SIGSEGV before main, while dyld is running the binary's static initializers:

Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000001

thread #1, stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x1)
  frame #0: 0x000000010000c8f0 a-build-sea`__cxx_global_var_init
  dyld  invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(...)
  dyld  mach_o::Header::forEachSection(...)
  dyld  dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const
  dyld  dyld4::JustInTimeLoader::runInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const
  dyld  dyld4::Loader::runInitializersBottomUp(...)
  dyld  dyld4::APIs::runAllInitializersForMain()

The faulting address is 0x1, which reads like an initializer entry that was not
relocated rather than a fault inside any particular initializer. (The frame #0 symbol
is a nearest-symbol guess and is probably not meaningful — the appended blob shifts
the symbolication.)

Additional information

Comparing the two outputs, the segment layout is structurally identical but
--build-sea places __DATA_CONST (and everything after it) one page higher than the
postject output does:

$ otool -l a-build-sea | grep -A4 LC_SEGMENT_64 | grep -E 'segname|vmaddr'
  segname __TEXT
   vmaddr 0x0000000100000000
  segname __DATA_CONST
   vmaddr 0x00000001061e1000
  segname __DATA
   vmaddr 0x0000000106394000
  segname NODE_SEA
   vmaddr 0x000000010640f000
  segname __LINKEDIT
   vmaddr 0x0000000106410000

$ otool -l d-postject | grep -A4 LC_SEGMENT_64 | grep -E 'segname|vmaddr'
  segname __TEXT
   vmaddr 0x0000000100000000
  segname __DATA_CONST
   vmaddr 0x00000001061e0000        # one page lower
  segname __DATA
   vmaddr 0x0000000106393000
  segname NODE_SEA
   vmaddr 0x000000010640e000
  segname __LINKEDIT
   vmaddr 0x000000010640f000

Both binaries carry __init_offsets and report identical Mach-O headers (ncmds 22,
sizeofcmds 2728), so the load commands themselves are not obviously malformed — but
__DATA_CONST moving without the initializer offsets following it would produce exactly
the observed 0x1. I have not confirmed that causally; it is where I would look first.

This is the same class of problem as #61483 (SEA build corrupting .gnu.hash on Linux
arm64) — the build step rewriting the container in a way the loader then rejects — on a
different platform and a different section. #61504 already skips --build-sea tests on
platforms where SEA is flaky; macOS x64 may belong in that set until this is understood.

Node was installed via nvm from the official tarball
(process.release.sourceUrl = https://nodejs.org/download/release/v26.7.0/node-v26.7.0.tar.gz),
so this is an official x64 build, not a self-compiled or Rosetta one.

Practical impact: a project shipping standalone executables cannot rely on --build-sea
on macOS x64 and has to keep the postject fallback alive, detecting the failure by
running the produced binary before trusting it.

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Comienza reproduciendo el fallo de macOS x64 con el comando documentado node --build-sea y, después, compara su disposición de segmentos Mach-O y __init_offsets con la ruta funcional que usa --experimental-sea-config más postject. Lee la cobertura existente de --build-sea a la que se hace referencia en #61504; se considera terminado cuando un ejecutable SEA generado se inicia correctamente en este host sin requerir el fallback de postject.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
javascript, node.js
Área
build-system, operating-systems
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Activo
Claridad
Bastante claro
Aptitud para principiantes
52/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.