sea: `--build-sea` produces a segfaulting executable on macOS x64 (v26.7.0), while the blob + postject path works on the same runtime
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- JavaScript
- Estrellas
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Merge medio
- 4 d 2 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 283
Descripción
Version
v26.7.0
Platform
Darwin 24.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 24.6.0 x86_64
macOS 15.7.3 (24G419), Intel Core i5-7500
Subsystem
sea
What steps will reproduce the bug?
On macOS x64, an executable produced by node --build-sea segfaults on launch — including
for a one-line hello world. The same runtime, given the same script through
--experimental-sea-config + postject, produces an executable that runs.
$ echo 'console.log("hello");' > hello.js
# --build-sea
$ printf '{"main":"hello.js","output":"a-build-sea","disableExperimentalSEAWarning":true}' > a.json
$ node --build-sea a.json
Generated single executable .../bin/node + a.json -> a-build-sea
$ codesign --remove-signature a-build-sea && codesign --sign - a-build-sea
$ ./a-build-sea
Segmentation fault: 11 # exit 139
# the blob path, same node, same script
$ printf '{"main":"hello.js","output":"hello.blob","disableExperimentalSEAWarning":true}' > blob.json
$ node --experimental-sea-config blob.json
Wrote single executable preparation blob to hello.blob
$ cp "$(command -v node)" d-postject && chmod 755 d-postject
$ npx postject d-postject NODE_SEA_BLOB hello.blob \
--sentinel-fuse NODE_SEA_FUSE_fce680ab2cc467b6e072b8b5df1996b2 \
--macho-segment-name NODE_SEA --overwrite
$ codesign --remove-signature d-postject && codesign --sign - d-postject
$ ./d-postject
hello # exit 0
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
Every time, on this host. Not conditional on anything in the config:
| variant | result |
|---|---|
--build-sea, CommonJS (no mainFormat) |
SIGSEGV |
--build-sea, "mainFormat": "module" |
SIGSEGV |
--build-sea, no codesign step at all |
SIGSEGV |
--experimental-sea-config + postject, same node |
runs |
So it is neither the module format nor the ad-hoc signature.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
node --build-sea should produce a runnable executable — it is documented as the
single-command replacement for the blob + postject procedure, and the procedure it
replaces works on this exact runtime.
What do you see instead?
SIGSEGV before main, while dyld is running the binary's static initializers:
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000001
thread #1, stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x1)
frame #0: 0x000000010000c8f0 a-build-sea`__cxx_global_var_init
dyld invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(...)
dyld mach_o::Header::forEachSection(...)
dyld dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const
dyld dyld4::JustInTimeLoader::runInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const
dyld dyld4::Loader::runInitializersBottomUp(...)
dyld dyld4::APIs::runAllInitializersForMain()
The faulting address is 0x1, which reads like an initializer entry that was not
relocated rather than a fault inside any particular initializer. (The frame #0 symbol
is a nearest-symbol guess and is probably not meaningful — the appended blob shifts
the symbolication.)
Additional information
Comparing the two outputs, the segment layout is structurally identical but
--build-sea places __DATA_CONST (and everything after it) one page higher than the
postject output does:
$ otool -l a-build-sea | grep -A4 LC_SEGMENT_64 | grep -E 'segname|vmaddr'
segname __TEXT
vmaddr 0x0000000100000000
segname __DATA_CONST
vmaddr 0x00000001061e1000
segname __DATA
vmaddr 0x0000000106394000
segname NODE_SEA
vmaddr 0x000000010640f000
segname __LINKEDIT
vmaddr 0x0000000106410000
$ otool -l d-postject | grep -A4 LC_SEGMENT_64 | grep -E 'segname|vmaddr'
segname __TEXT
vmaddr 0x0000000100000000
segname __DATA_CONST
vmaddr 0x00000001061e0000 # one page lower
segname __DATA
vmaddr 0x0000000106393000
segname NODE_SEA
vmaddr 0x000000010640e000
segname __LINKEDIT
vmaddr 0x000000010640f000
Both binaries carry __init_offsets and report identical Mach-O headers (ncmds 22,
sizeofcmds 2728), so the load commands themselves are not obviously malformed — but
__DATA_CONST moving without the initializer offsets following it would produce exactly
the observed 0x1. I have not confirmed that causally; it is where I would look first.
This is the same class of problem as #61483 (SEA build corrupting .gnu.hash on Linux
arm64) — the build step rewriting the container in a way the loader then rejects — on a
different platform and a different section. #61504 already skips --build-sea tests on
platforms where SEA is flaky; macOS x64 may belong in that set until this is understood.
Node was installed via nvm from the official tarball
(process.release.sourceUrl = https://nodejs.org/download/release/v26.7.0/node-v26.7.0.tar.gz),
so this is an official x64 build, not a self-compiled or Rosetta one.
Practical impact: a project shipping standalone executables cannot rely on --build-sea
on macOS x64 and has to keep the postject fallback alive, detecting the failure by
running the produced binary before trusting it.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza reproduciendo el fallo de macOS x64 con el comando documentado node --build-sea y, después, compara su disposición de segmentos Mach-O y __init_offsets con la ruta funcional que usa --experimental-sea-config más postject. Lee la cobertura existente de --build-sea a la que se hace referencia en #61504; se considera terminado cuando un ejecutable SEA generado se inicia correctamente en este host sin requerir el fallback de postject.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- javascript, node.js
- Área
- build-system, operating-systems
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 52/100