Feature request: PTY support in `child_process.spawn()`

What is the problem this feature will solve?

Please add first-class pseudo-terminal (PTY) support to child_process.spawn()
(and ideally spawnSync()), so child processes see a real TTY on stdout/stderr/stdin
instead of pipes.

Today, the only practical option is third-party native addons such as
node-pty. That works, but it adds
native compilation, Electron/ABI friction, and an extra dependency for a capability
that shells and other runtimes expose natively.

Built-in PTY support would make Node.js a better cross-platform choice for
developer tools, CI runners, test harnesses, and build orchestrators compared
with wrapping PowerShell or Python just to get a TTY.

Problem

When spawn() uses the default stdio: ['pipe', 'pipe', 'pipe'], the child's
stdout/stderr are not TTYs. Many programs behave differently:

• Block buffering instead of line buffering (bash, make, gcc, pacman, etc.)
• isatty() / process.stdout.isTTY is false (no ANSI colors, different log format)
• Interactive prompts break (password prompts, read, pagers)
• Progress output is delayed until buffers fill or the process exits

Workarounds are incomplete:

• stdbuf -oL -eL only affects some libc-buffered programs; grandchild processes
  (e.g. make jobs) may still block-buffer.
• script -q -f allocates a PTY but adds Script started/done noise to logs.
• Redirecting to a file (>log.txt) inside the shell has the same non-TTY behavior.

Concrete use case

I maintain a cross-platform bootstrap/build runner (Windows + MSYS/Cygwin) written
in TypeScript/Node.js because it is faster and simpler to ship than PowerShell or
Python for this use case.

The runner uses spawn(bash, ['--login', '-c', script]) and tees output to both
the terminal and a log file. Without a PTY:

1. The terminal shows almost nothing for minutes ("stuck" UX).
2. The log file updates in large bursts, not line-by-line.
3. Some toolchain steps change behavior under non-TTY conditions.

We currently wrap commands in stdbuf -oL -eL and manually tee data events.
That helps a little but is fragile and platform-dependent. A PTY would fix the
root cause.

Minimal desired behavior:

import { spawn } from 'node:child_process';
import { createWriteStream } from 'node:fs';

const log = createWriteStream('build.log');
const child = spawn('bash', ['--login', '-c', 'make -j8'], {
  cwd: repoRoot,
  env: process.env,
  stdio: ['pipe', 'pty', 'pty'], // or a dedicated option; see below
});

child.on('data', (chunk) => {
  log.write(chunk);
  process.stdout.write(chunk);
});

The child should believe it has a terminal (isatty(1) === true), use
line-oriented output, and flush promptly.

Why not node-pty?

node-pty is widely used (VS Code, etc.)
and I am grateful it exists, but for application-level build/CI tooling it has
drawbacks:

• Native addon: requires node-gyp/prebuilds; breaks or needs rebuilds across
  Node/Electron ABI changes.
• Extra dependency for something that feels like core process/spawn behavior.
• API divergence from child_process.spawn() (different return type, resize
  events, etc.).

For terminal emulators, node-pty is fine. For "run this shell script and stream
output live to console + log", PTY belongs in core next to spawn.

Proposed API (sketch)

Option A - extend stdio:

spawn(cmd, args, {
  stdio: ['pipe', 'pty', 'pty'],
  pty: {
    cols: process.stdout.columns ?? 80,
    rows: process.stdout.rows ?? 24,
    name: 'xterm-256color',
  },
});

Option B - dedicated flag:

spawn(cmd, args, {
  pty: true,
  stdio: ['pipe', 'pipe', 'pipe'],
});

Requirements:

• Works on Linux, macOS, Windows 10+ (ConPTY).
• Document graceful failure on older Windows (throw or fallback to pipes).
• Optional resize(cols, rows) on the child handle.
• PTY stream emits data events; stdin remains writable for automation.
• Document interaction with shell: true, detached, windowsHide.

Platform notes

• POSIX: forkpty(3) / openpty + session setup (Node already has test helpers in
  test/pseudo-tty/pty_helper.py).
• Windows: CreatePseudoConsole() (ConPTY). Older Windows may need documented
  unsupported behavior rather than winpty-level emulation in core.

Prior art / related issues

• libuv feature request: https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/2640
• libuv PTY implementation PR: https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/4802
• Node issue (closed, blocked on libuv): https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/46105
• Related: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/31409

This request is blocked on libuv PTY landing first; once libuv exposes
spawn-with-PTY, please expose it through child_process.

Why this matters for Node.js

Node is already the default for cross-platform CLI tooling (yarn, vite, eslint,
etc.). Live, faithful subprocess output is a basic expectation for:

• build systems and monorepo orchestrators
• test runners
• dev environment bootstrap scripts
• CI log streaming

Without PTY, authors either accept broken UX, add native deps, or shell out to
PowerShell/Python/bash script hacks. Native PTY would close that gap and reduce
reliance on node-pty for non-terminal-emulator use cases.

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

Add optional pseudo-terminal (PTY) support to child_process.spawn() (and
spawnSync()) so a spawned child can use a real TTY instead of pipes.

Proposed API (either shape is fine):

spawn(cmd, args, {
stdio: ['pipe', 'pty', 'pty'],
pty: { cols, rows, name: 'xterm-256color' },
});

or:

spawn(cmd, args, { pty: true, stdio: ['pipe', 'pipe', 'pipe'] });

Behavior:

• Child sees isatty(stdout/stderr) === true (line-buffered output, colors,
  interactive prompts work as in a real terminal).
• Parent gets a readable/writable PTY stream (emit 'data', write stdin).
• Optional child.resize(cols, rows) for terminal size changes.
• Linux/macOS via POSIX PTY; Windows 10+ via ConPTY; document unsupported
  fallback on older Windows.

This should be implemented on top of libuv PTY support (libuv#2640,
libuv PR#4802) and exposed through child_process, similar to how pipe
and inherit stdio modes work today.

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

Beginne am Einstiegspunkt child_process.spawn() und prüfe test/pseudo-tty/pty_helper.py. Sieh dir anschließend das referenzierte libuv-Issue und den PR an, da die Anfrage durch die libuv-PTY-Unterstützung blockiert ist. Für den Abschluss wäre eine abgestimmte API mit plattformübergreifendem POSIX- und ConPTY-Verhalten erforderlich, einschließlich Stream-, Resize-, Fallback- und spawnSync-Behandlung.