fs.globSync() uses process.cwd() when building the root exclude Dirent with withFileTypes
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- JavaScript
- Sterne
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Ø Merge
- 4 T. 2 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 283
Beschreibung
Version
v25.8.2
Platform
Darwin arm64
Subsystem
fs
What steps will reproduce the bug?
const { mkdtempSync, mkdirSync, writeFileSync, globSync } = require('node:fs');
const { tmpdir } = require('node:os');
const { join } = require('node:path');
const { chdir, cwd } = require('node:process');
const base = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'glob-root-'));
const ambient = join(base, 'ambient');
const root = join(base, 'root');
mkdirSync(ambient, { recursive: true });
mkdirSync(join(root, 'a'), { recursive: true });
writeFileSync(join(ambient, 'a'), 'shadow-file');
writeFileSync(join(root, 'a', 'real.txt'), 'real');
chdir(ambient);
const seen = [];
const result = globSync('a/**', {
cwd: root,
withFileTypes: true,
exclude: (dirent) => {
seen.push({
name: dirent.name,
parentPath: dirent.parentPath,
isDirectory: dirent.isDirectory(),
isFile: dirent.isFile(),
});
return dirent.isDirectory();
},
});
console.log(JSON.stringify({
processCwd: cwd(),
globCwd: root,
seen,
result: result.map((dirent) => ({
name: dirent.name,
parentPath: dirent.parentPath,
isDirectory: dirent.isDirectory(),
isFile: dirent.isFile(),
})),
}, null, 2));
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
It reproduces consistently in globSync() when all of the following are true:
withFileTypes: truecwd !== process.cwd()- the pattern goes through the root-entry
#addSubpattern()path (for examplea/**)
If the ambient process.cwd() also contains the same relative path, the callback receives a Dirent for the ambient path instead of the glob cwd path. If the ambient cwd does not contain that path, the root entry can skip the callback entirely because statSync(path) returns null.
The async glob path does not seem affected.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
The exclude callback should receive a Dirent describing the candidate entry under options.cwd.
For the repro above, the callback should receive a directory dirent for <globCwd>/a, so dirent.isDirectory() should be true and the result should be an empty array because the callback returns true for directories.
What do you see instead?
The callback receives a Dirent for the ambient process.cwd() path instead:
{
"processCwd": "/tmp/.../ambient",
"globCwd": "/tmp/.../root",
"seen": [
{
"name": "a",
"parentPath": ".",
"isDirectory": false,
"isFile": true
},
{
"name": "real.txt",
"parentPath": "/tmp/.../root/a",
"isDirectory": false,
"isFile": true
}
],
"result": [
{
"name": "a",
"parentPath": "/tmp/.../root",
"isDirectory": true,
"isFile": false
},
{
"name": "real.txt",
"parentPath": "/tmp/.../root/a",
"isDirectory": false,
"isFile": true
}
]
}
So the root a entry is not excluded even though the callback logic is meant to exclude directories.
Additional information
This looks like a sync-only regression in the root-path exclude handling added for #56260 / #57420.
In lib/internal/fs/glob.js, #addSubpattern() computes const fullpath = resolve(this.#root, path), but in the withFileTypes + exclude branch it does:
const stat = this.#cache.statSync(path);
That appears to stat a path relative to process.cwd() instead of options.cwd. The async path already uses await this.#cache.stat(fullpath).
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginnen Sie in lib/internal/fs/glob.js bei #addSubpattern() und vergleichen Sie den synchronen withFileTypes- und exclude-Zweig mit dem asynchronen Pfad. Reproduzieren Sie das Problem mit dem mitgelieferten Skript und überprüfen Sie anschließend, dass der exclude-Callback einen Dirent für das glob cwd statt für process.cwd() erhält und dass das Verzeichnis ausgeschlossen wird.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- javascript
- Bereich
- operating-systems
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 76/100