os.cpus().length performance on modern AMD CPUs inside containers
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- JavaScript
- 星标
- 122k
- 派生
- 37.4k
- 平均合并
- 4 天 3 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 272
描述
Version
v24.14.0
Platform
- Bare metal machine
- Host: Linux Ubuntu 24
- Container Image: `node:alpine-24`
- CPU: `AMD EPYC 4584PX 16-Core Processor`
Subsystem
os
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Firstly, I'm not entirely sure if this is a bug, so apologies if this is known or in the wrong spot - it just feels like something that shouldn't be this slow vs other platforms. I couldn't find any other real references to this other than a discussion at https://github.com/nodejs/performance/issues/93 which mentions this being slow.
With a modern AMD CPU such as the one listed above, run the following with Docker:
docker run --rm node:24-alpine node -e "console.time('cpus'); os.cpus().length; console.timeEnd('cpus')"
I've also attached an strace output for reference. It seems to iterate over /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq, some of which can take 20ms to return.
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
This requires a modern AMD CPU, with Linux, and run within a container. Otherwise it seems to happen almost 100% of the time in our testing.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
I would expect it to return much more quickly as it does on Intel systems.
What do you see instead?
cpus: 649.982ms
regularly >500ms runtime on a machine with 32 cores.
Additional information
No response
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先,在所列出的 AMD/Linux 设置上复现 issue 中的 Docker 命令,并检查附带的 strace.log。跟踪读取 scaling_cur_freq 的 os.cpus() 路径,然后将其行为与 Intel 系统进行比较;完成的标准是测量到的调用速度显著提升,同时不改变其结果。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- docker, javascript, linux, node.js
- 领域
- operating-systems, performance
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 45/100