fs.copyFile fails if source is readonly and target is a CIFS volume

Version

v22.21.1

Platform

Linux a7f6d3be6434 5.15.158-2-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.15.158-2 (2024-07-26T13:11Z) x86_64 Linux

Docker: Alpine release 3.22.2

Subsystem

fs

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Hi,

Copying sample.docx fails with EPERM because the source is read-only and the destination is a CIFS share.

Probably related to:

https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/37284
https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/3117
https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/44261

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

100% reproducible

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

/mnt/smb is a CIFS-mounted volume.
sample.docx is a file with read-only permissions for the user running the below code.

Code

import {copyFile} from "fs/promises";

const src = "./sample.docx";
const dest = "/mnt/smb/sample.docx";

await copyFile(src, dest);

console.log("File copied successfully");

The fs.copyFile should be able to succeed in copying the file as long as the destination folder is writable.

What do you see instead?

Error

node:internal/modules/run_main:123
    triggerUncaughtException(
    ^
[Error: EPERM: operation not permitted, copyfile './sample.docx' -> '/mnt/smb/sample.docx'] {
  errno: -1,
  code: 'EPERM',
  syscall: 'copyfile',
  path: './sample.docx',
  dest: '/mnt/smb/sample.docx'
}

Additional information

Works with no error

cp ./sample.docx /mnt/smb/sample.docx

Beginne am fs/promises-Einstiegspunkt copyFile und reproduziere den Fehler unter Linux mit einer schreibgeschützten Quelle und einem beschreibbaren CIFS-Ziel. Vergleiche das Verhalten von Node mit cp und lies anschließend die verknüpften Node.js- und libuv-Issues. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn copyFile unter den angegebenen Berechtigungen ohne den gemeldeten EPERM-Fehler erfolgreich ist.