nodejs / nodejs/node

Slow performances when running tests with `--experimental-test-coverage`

未关闭
#55,103 12 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

coverage test_runner
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
122k
派生
37.4k
平均合并
4 天 3 小时
30 天内合并 PR
272

描述

Version

v22.9.0

Platform
Darwin N4V4PGFGPT 23.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 23.6.0: Mon Jul 29 21:16:46 PDT 2024; root:xnu-10063.141.2~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T8112 arm64
Subsystem

No response

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Run tests with --experimental-test-coverage option. Comparing it to other solutions (f.e. running Node tests and getting the coverage with nyc) this is way slower. For instance, on a repo with ~800 tests, collecting coverage with nyc takes 77s, while running with --experimental-test-coverage takes 148s.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

I can reproduce it every time I run the Node tests with the native test coverage option.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

The performances should be at least equal (ideally better) than with 3rd party dependencies (like nyc).

What do you see instead?

An average time spent per test of 185ms vs 96ms.

Additional information

I tried running with/without additional options (f.e. --test-coverage-exclude, --test-coverage-include, --test-coverage-branches, --test-coverage-functions, --test-coverage-lines) but it didn't help. The performance issue seems only to be related to the algorithm that's triggered by the --experimental-test-coverage option.

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

首先使用大约 800 个测试组成的测试套件重现报告中的耗时,将 --experimental-test-coveragenyc 以及列出的 coverage 选项进行比较。跟踪由 native option 触发的 coverage 算法;当 coverage 保持正确且其性能大幅接近比较对象时,即视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
javascript, node.js
领域
performance, testing-qa
Issue 类型
缺陷
难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
48/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。