Importing module on filesystem from data URL throws `TypeError: Invalid URL` / `ERR_UNSUPPORTED_RESOLVE_REQUEST: Invalid relative URL or base scheme is not hierarchical.`

Version

v20.11.1

Platform

Linux devbox.home.arpa 6.1.0-16-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.67-1 (2023-12-12) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Subsystem

No response

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Creating an index.mjs file with the following contents and running it with node index.mjs causes nodejs to be unable to resolve the foo module when running in base-64 land.

import fsp from 'fs/promises';

// create `foo` module
await fsp.mkdir('./node_modules/foo', { recursive: true });
await fsp.writeFile(
    './node_modules/foo/package.json',
    JSON.stringify({
        name: 'foo',
        exports: {
            '.': './index.mjs',
        },
    })
);

// build base64 url just importing `foo`
const importName = `foo`;
const unencoded = `await import("${importName}")`;
const encoded = Buffer.from(unencoded).toString('base64');
const url = `data:text/javascript;base64,${encoded}`;

// import that base 64 url
await import(url);

This seems to be because to resolve foo we try to load package.json's, but it seems like we're trying to do it from the data URL, which can't work.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

You should run this code somewhere where it's safe to create a new node_modules.

Running the code always produces the same result on macOS and Linux. Untested on Windows.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

Either:

• nodejs should error with a clear description of the problem, rather than throw an internal error from URL
• (or) nodejs should allow importing from the data URL by using the context of the base64 module's parent for imports called from the base64 module

I think either this shouldn't try to do this and should error explicitly that it's not supported, or it should work if it's within scope/spec. I'd argue an internal error saying the URL is invalid (when both package.json and the data URL are valid) is confusing here for most nodejs developers.

What do you see instead?

node:internal/url:775
    this.#updateContext(bindingUrl.parse(input, base));
                                   ^

TypeError: Invalid URL
    at new URL (node:internal/url:775:36)
    at getPackageScopeConfig (node:internal/modules/esm/package_config:29:24)
    at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:807:25)
    at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:910:20)
    at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1130:11)
    at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:396:12)
    at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:365:25)
    at ModuleLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:240:38)
    at ModuleLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:328:34)
    at importModuleDynamically (node:internal/modules/esm/translators:158:35) {
  code: 'ERR_INVALID_URL',
  input: './package.json',
  base: 'data:text/javascript;base64,YXdhaXQgaW1wb3J0KCJmb28iKQ=='
}

Node.js v20.11.1

Additional information

Potentially related to #51444 and #38714

Potentially related to subsystems:

@nodejs/loaders @nodejs/modules

Workaround: https://github.com/benjamingwynn/data-import-fix

Inizia con i percorsi di risoluzione ESM mostrati in internal/modules/esm/package_config e internal/modules/esm/resolve, usando la riproduzione index.mjs e il relativo data URL come prima esecuzione. Traccia il modo in cui la ricerca di package.json riceve il data URL come base, quindi verifica che il risultato sia un import supportato oppure un errore chiaro e intenzionale, anziché il fallimento dell’URL interno mostrato.