Importing module on filesystem from data URL throws `TypeError: Invalid URL` / `ERR_UNSUPPORTED_RESOLVE_REQUEST: Invalid relative URL or base scheme is not hierarchical.`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Avg merge
- 4d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 283
Description
Version
v20.11.1
Platform
Linux devbox.home.arpa 6.1.0-16-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.67-1 (2023-12-12) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
No response
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Creating an index.mjs file with the following contents and running it with node index.mjs causes nodejs to be unable to resolve the foo module when running in base-64 land.
import fsp from 'fs/promises';
// create `foo` module
await fsp.mkdir('./node_modules/foo', { recursive: true });
await fsp.writeFile(
'./node_modules/foo/package.json',
JSON.stringify({
name: 'foo',
exports: {
'.': './index.mjs',
},
})
);
// build base64 url just importing `foo`
const importName = `foo`;
const unencoded = `await import("${importName}")`;
const encoded = Buffer.from(unencoded).toString('base64');
const url = `data:text/javascript;base64,${encoded}`;
// import that base 64 url
await import(url);
This seems to be because to resolve foo we try to load package.json's, but it seems like we're trying to do it from the data URL, which can't work.
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
You should run this code somewhere where it's safe to create a new node_modules.
Running the code always produces the same result on macOS and Linux. Untested on Windows.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
Either:
- nodejs should error with a clear description of the problem, rather than throw an internal error from URL
- (or) nodejs should allow importing from the data URL by using the context of the base64 module's parent for imports called from the base64 module
I think either this shouldn't try to do this and should error explicitly that it's not supported, or it should work if it's within scope/spec. I'd argue an internal error saying the URL is invalid (when both package.json and the data URL are valid) is confusing here for most nodejs developers.
What do you see instead?
node:internal/url:775
this.#updateContext(bindingUrl.parse(input, base));
^
TypeError: Invalid URL
at new URL (node:internal/url:775:36)
at getPackageScopeConfig (node:internal/modules/esm/package_config:29:24)
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:807:25)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:910:20)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1130:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:396:12)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:365:25)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:240:38)
at ModuleLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:328:34)
at importModuleDynamically (node:internal/modules/esm/translators:158:35) {
code: 'ERR_INVALID_URL',
input: './package.json',
base: 'data:text/javascript;base64,YXdhaXQgaW1wb3J0KCJmb28iKQ=='
}
Node.js v20.11.1
Additional information
Potentially related to #51444 and #38714
Potentially related to subsystems:
@nodejs/loaders @nodejs/modules
Workaround: https://github.com/benjamingwynn/data-import-fix
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the ESM resolution paths shown in internal/modules/esm/package_config and internal/modules/esm/resolve, using the index.mjs reproduction and its data URL as the first run. Trace how the package.json lookup receives the data URL base, then verify the result is either a supported import or a clear, intentional error rather than the shown internal URL failure.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript, node.js
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100