--test-name-pattern needing to come before filenames is hostile to npm scripts
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- JavaScript
- Étoiles
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Merge moyen
- 4 j 2 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 283
Description
What is the problem this feature will solve?
It is common practice to set up npm scripts for testing. E.g.
{
"test": "node --test tests/*.js more-tests/*.js"
}
However, this cannot be combined with --test-name-pattern. Attempting to do so, e.g.
npm test -- --test-name-pattern="my pattern"
will not work, because this gets translated to
node --test tests/*.js more-tests/*.js --test-name-pattern="my pattern"
which, I believe, ends up passing --test-name-pattern="my pattern" as an argument to these test files, instead of passing it as an argument to the test runner. The correct invocation is
node --test-name-pattern="my pattern" --test tests/*.js more-tests/*.js
but this is impossible to do via npm scripts, it seems. (See alternatives considered.)
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
I don't know what a good solution to this would be. Some possible ideas:
-
Special-case command line processing such that when
--testis present,nodegrabs the--test-name-patternargument for itself instead of passing it to scripts? -
Introduce a new binary, e.g.
node_test, which processes command-line arguments in such a way? I believe this is how most test runners behave. -
Introduce a file-based customization of the test runner, including which tests to run, so that I don't have to pass the test filenames as arguments to the test runner in a way that causes this problem?
-
Improve npm scripts to support a better method of passing arguments in the middle of the script? (See below.)
What alternatives have you considered?
I investigated how to get npm scripts to substitute in arguments you pass to npm run into the script command, so that the translation becomes the correct one. This is a well-studied problem, and the following two Stack Overflow posts have the best answers, as far as I can tell:
None of them seem very satisfactory, unfortunately. In particular, if you want something that works cross-platform, you basically have to write a wrapper script.
As an alternative, I could continue using other test runners, which support npm scripts better.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par reproduire l’invocation de npm test avec --test-name-pattern et comparez-la à la commande fonctionnelle dans laquelle l’option précède --test et les noms de fichiers. Examinez la gestion de la ligne de commande de Node pour --test et --test-name-pattern ; la tâche ne pourra être considérée comme terminée qu’avec une approche définie prenant en charge ce cas d’utilisation de npm-script, probablement accompagnée de tests couvrant l’ordre des arguments.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- javascript, node.js
- Domaine
- cli, testing-qa
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100